| 摘要: |
| 城市更新市场化运作的关键在
于通过持有并运营空间资产，实现资产
价值提升与现金流可持续，这个过程中
金融机构参与和金融工具运用的特点，
与城市空间扩张时期的新地开发呈现
出明显的差异。本文基于金融化和生
命周期理论，以城市更新空间资产运
作的“投资、融资、管理、退出”过程
为分析框架，揭示当前市场主体参与城
市更新的金融实践特征。以北京市L 村
城中村改造项目为例，研究分析了金融
机构作为实施主体介入城市更新的“投
融管退”特点，通过项目的历时分析刻
画了更新过程中空间金融化的微观渗透
进程，以此揭示金融资本介入城市更新
的导向和方式变化。 |
| 关键词: 城市更新 投融资 空间金融
化 城中村 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240523003 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目（24&ZD148） |
|
| Characteristics of financial practices in urban renewal: An analysis based on the “investment,financing, management, exit” process |
|
LI Lanqing,LIU Hongxian,DENG Linna,TANG Yan,GAO Bo
|
| Abstract: |
| The key to the market-oriented operation of urban renewal lies in the realization of asset value
enhancement and sustainable cash flow through the holding and operation of spatial assets. In this process,
the characteristics of the participation of financial institutions and the application of financial tools show
obvious differences from those in the new land development during the urban spatial expansion period.
Based on the financialization and life-cycle theories, this paper takes the “investment, financing,
management, and exit” process of urban renewal spatial asset operation as the analysis framework to reveal
the current financial practice characteristics of market entities’ participation in urban renewal. The
investment stage is the process of capital intervening in asset targets. Compared with the traditional realestate
development model, urban renewal pays more attention to the handling of asset compliance in the
context of diversified investment targets, and has gradually formed a cooperation model that separates light
and heavy assets of “project operation + property rights holding”, and attaches more importance to the longterm
and complexity of investment calculation. The financing stage is the process of magnifying the capital
leverage, and the methods mainly include two categories: debt and equity. For debt-based financing, the
credit granting characteristics of commercial banks and policy banks for urban renewal projects are
reflected in two aspects. Firstly, the characteristics of loan products are in line with the asset characteristics
such as low returns and complex compliance presented by some urban renewal projects. Secondly, the
creation of loan products often follows the major national strategic directions, reflecting the national macroorientation
of tilting financial capital towards weak and key areas of economic and social development. For
equity-based financing, the main entities participating in equity investment in urban renewal emerging in the
current market mainly include private equity investment institutions, insurance institutions with equity
investment business, trust institutions carrying out equity-based trust business, asset management
companies (AMCs) involved in equity operation, etc. In recent years, many places have also started to set up
government investment funds for urban renewal. The capital costs and investment preferences of various
institutions vary. The management stage focuses on realizing the preservation and appreciation of urban
renewal assets and increasing project profits. In urban renewal projects, market entities mainly achieve
efficiency enhancement and cost reduction and improve project cash flow through principles such as
“operationalization” of space design and “refinement” of operation and maintenance. The risks of urban
renewal mainly come from space, economy, society. The implementing entities need to establish reasonable
control measures to ensure asset safety and increase asset value. In order to achieve the “cost-revenue”
balance of urban renewal through more channels, the new practice of market entities and financial
institutions is to use urban renewal projects as “customer acquisition scenarios” to expand revenue paths.
The exit stage is the way and the final goal for the investment entity to realize the value of the transformed
assets, and thus realizing the capital logic loop of the entire project operation. It includes self-holding
operation, asset transfer, and REITs listing. The applicable scenarios and characteristics of various exit
methods are different. Self-holding operation is suitable for projects with long-term operation potential and
stable cash flow that can be generated through continuous operation, such as the renovation of oldresidential areas and rental housing, and can match long-term or policy-based loans. Asset transfer is suitable for projects with significantly increased asset value
after renovation, especially high-end properties such as commercial office buildings and commercial complexes, and can match institutional investors with high
capital costs and short cycles. The listing of REITs and others is suitable for projects with stable cash flow and suitable for securitization operations, covering
industrial parks, rental housing, etc. Immature projects can issue Pre-REITs. Taking the urban village reconstruction project of L Village in Beijing as an
example, this paper studies and analyzes the “investment, financing, management, and exit” characteristics of financial institutions as the implementing entities
in urban renewal, and depicts the micro-penetration process of spatial financialization in the renewal process through the diachronic analysis of the project. The
theoretical contribution of this paper lies in placing the financialization of urban renewal in the institutional environment with Chinese characteristics and
comparing it with the previous “land financialization” to reveal the changes in the orientation and mode of financial capital’s intervention in urban renewal. |
| Key words: urban renewal investment and financing spatial financialization urban village |
