| 摘要: |
| ：“正式制度”与“非正式制度”的
交织融合与应变演进是中国渐进式制度（包
括农村土地产权）变迁的重要特征。聚焦我
国现代乡村产业结构转型下土地的存量与质
量不足问题，探究其高效率发展的应变机制
与运维导控策略。在整体层面作出改革开放
以来国家法律统领、村集体自主创设以及地
方政府协调治理等三重现象相融共生的农村
土地产权异质稳定的释因，结合生产要素投
入两大基本关系，构建“三权分置”格局下
对农村土地利用效率提升驱动力的认知逻
辑。以浙江农村土地利用实态为研究线索，
揭示其土地高效能利用的分异特征和应变机
制。归纳和展望了随着城镇化进入存量时
代，以集体土地产权合并、“一股一票”激
活要素、土地利用参数化和品质化导控为内
容塑造县域土地“产权—要素—功能”共同
体的未来乡村新图景，以期为推动农村土地
利用的高效能发展、建设城乡共同富裕示范
区提供理论支持与法则借鉴。 |
| 关键词: “三权分置”格局 土地利用 应
变机制 效能跃迁 浙江农村 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20250302002 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重大项目（2022&ZD080）；浙江省自然科学基金资助项目（LY21E080021）；
浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目（21NDJC035YB） |
|
| Adaptation mechanism and efficiency leap in rural land use under the “Three RightsSeparation” pattern: An actual state study of rural land use in Zhejiang Province |
|
SUN Peiwen,WANG Zhu,QIAN Zhenlan,PU Xincheng
|
| Abstract: |
| The integration, coordination and coevolution of “formal institution” and “informal
institution” are significant features of China’s gradual institutional reform, and rural land property
rights are no exception. Focusing on the issues of low quality and insufficient land uses under the
transformation towards a modern rural industrial structure, this paper explores the adaptation
mechanisms and operational guidance strategies of efficient rural land use development. In
accordance with the new institutional economics and modern economic growth theory, the paper
illustrates the driving force behind rural land use efficiency as a multi-factor system, with stability of
land property rights as its core, supported by rational input of production factors. At a macro level, it
explains the heterogeneous stability of rural land property rights throughout the country since reform
and opening-up, which is a symbiotic integration of legal leadership by the nation, independent
creations of village collectives, and coordinated governance of local governments, unpacks the two
basic relationships of production factors input and constructs a cognitive logic for the driving forces
behind rural land use efficiency under the “Three Rights Separation” pattern. Taking actual states of
rural land uses in Zhejiang Province as a research clue, the paper reveals the differentiated
characteristics and adaptation mechanisms behind its leap of land use efficiency. Due to constraints
such as a prominent contradiction of large population and land and capital shortages, a “trinity rural
land” use pattern has emerged in Zhejiang, characterized by interventionist concentration of
agricultural land, flexible management of construction land, and a well-developed “informal
economy” in residential land in spite of scarce collective commercial land. The approach taken by
local governments of Zhejiang regarding land management is to exchange space for time, linking
inclusive infrastructure investment with industrial innovation and growth, promoting a model of
efficient land use that starts with “single-point activation in villages” to “multi-point linkage in
counties” through the operational mechanism of leveraging capable individuals to drive the upgrading
and integration of low-dimensional platforms. It helps to realize urbanization and economic
development zones externally, regulating rural land use, strengthening collective land ownership and
enhancing the supply of rural public goods internally, achieving more significant rural land use
improvements compared to other developed coastal provinces. As urbanization enters the stock
redevelopment age, the paper summarizes and anticipates the future rural landscape of a county-level
“property right-factor-function” land use community, with the merger of collective land property
rights, activation of factor through “one share, one voucher”, and the parameterization and quality
control of land use, in order to allow business entities with advantages in production factors to assume
the responsibility for rural industrial growth while enabling more farmers to voluntarily and decently
exit inefficient land use. The reform experience of the “Three Rights Separation” pattern of rural landuse in Zhejiang provides valuable references for other regions across the country, and lays a theoretical foundation and practical basis for further innovation in
building a demonstration area for urban and rural common prosperity and in the reform of the rural land property rights. In the future, a balance between the
principles of national legal framework and the autonomous exploration of local practices will be the key to continuously improving rural land use efficiency,
providing theoretical exploration and practical support for the further establishment of “formal institution”. |
| Key words: "Three Rights Separation" pattern Land Use Adaptation Mechanism Efficiency Leap Rural Zhejiang |
