摘要: |
快速城镇化与极端气候变化的背景
下,城市遭受超设防标准灾害性事件冲击的
频率不断增加。社区作为城市管理的基本单
元,韧性社区研究对提升当前风险治理能力
具有重要意义。本文运用CiteSpace 文献计量
方法,以Web of Science 核心合集中1986—
2022 年1 023 篇韧性社区研究论文为研究对
象,通过文献共被引、关键词共现及突现词
等分析,针对韧性社区领域进行了研究回顾
与展望。研究发现,当前韧性社区研究已基
本形成完整的理论和方法体系,但是在研究
理论的支撑性、评价方法的集成性、前沿分
支的丰富性等仍待进一步提升,集中体现在:
韧性社区研究的主要知识群组包括韧性社区
概念起源、韧性社区基础理论框架、韧性社
区评价方法、社区灾害风险识别与响应机制;
韧性社区研究的主要发展路径包括“韧性社
区理论研究”、“韧性理论—韧性社区评价—
韧性能力提升”与“韧性社区—社区灾害风
险评价—社区灾害响应模型”;韧性社区动态
衡量模型成为当前韧性社区研究前沿,未来
应聚焦多维视角的理论框架、关键影响因素、
动态耦合的评价模型、韧性社区规划范式与
全周期的韧性行动方案等开展深化研究。 |
关键词: 韧性社区 知识图谱 演进路径 研究综述 CiteSpace |
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20230623001 |
分类号: |
基金项目:国家重点研发计划项目子课题(2023YFC3807404-01);国家自然科学基金青年项目(42201219);教育部人文社会科学研究一般基金项目(24YJAZH115);
教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(22YJC790070);广东省基础与应用基础研究基金区域联合基金项目(青年基金项目)(2020A1515110768);北京
建筑大学博士研究生科研能力提升项目(DG2024001);北京建筑大学硕士研究生创新项目(PG2024016) |
|
Advances and future hotspots in international resilient communities research |
RONG Yuefang,SONG Jian,LIN Haoxi
|
Abstract: |
Under the background of global environmental change and rapid urbanization, urban
flooding, typhoon disasters, public health events and many other urban safety problems are
emerging, and various uncertain risks have become important obstacles to urban safety and
sustainable development, and how to better address this problem and achieve effective early warning
is becoming a common concern of different interest groups. As a specific unit of risk management at
the grassroots level, the community plays an indispensable role as the “last kilometer” in planning,
construction and management, so the research on the interaction and coupling between resilience
and the community has become an area of great concern. Incorporating the concept of resilience into
community governance and development is not only necessary for the construction of the
community itself, but also plays a fundamental role in enhancing the overall resilience level of cities
from the bottom up.Taking 1 023 articles of the resilient community research from 1986-2022 in the
core collection of Web of Science as the research subjects, this paper used CiteSpace bibliometric
method to review and prosper the research on resilient community, specific methods including
literature co-citation, keyword co-occurrence and burst word analysis. It was found that the current
resilient community research has completed the structure of the basic theory and research system,
but the research on the evaluation system is too concentrated, and there are fewer frontier branches.
The following are some of the most important findings: 1) The boom in resilient communities
research was formed in the past decade, and the related research field has become an important
branch of research to help cities achieve sustainable development. 2) Countries such as the United
States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Germany and Sweden have been influential in the field of
resilient communities’ research and have played an important role in facilitating international
collaboration. 3) The main knowledge groups of resilient community research include the origin of
the concept of resilient community, the basic theoretical framework of resilient community,
community resilience evaluation methods, community disaster risk identification and response
mechanisms. 4) Research on resilient community is summarized into three core paths: research path
of “basic theory of community resilience”, research path of “resilient community-community
resilience evaluation-capacity improvement of community resilience”, and research path of
“resilient community-evaluation of community disasters and risks-response model of community
disaster”. 5) Research on dynamic measurement model of community resilience has become the
current frontier of resilient community research, how to dynamically simulate the non-linear
interaction between social and environmental systems has become a key technical issue in resilient
community research and even resilient city research.The construction of resilient communities is a
long-term and systematic project, which requires continuous improvement of the theoretical
framework, evaluation methods and governance system. The study summarizes the insights andprospects from five aspects: building a theoretical framework with a multi-dimensional perspective, clarifying key influencing factors, exploring a dynamically
coupled evaluation model, establishing a resilient community-planning paradigm, and proposing a full-cycle resilience action plan, with a view to providing
guidance for deepening the relevant research. |
Key words: resilient community knowledge mapping evolutionary paths research review CiteSpace |