|
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 111次 下载 269次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
|
|
| 社区更新驱动下的创新空间发展与规划策略研究 |
|
郎 嵬1, 傅丹虹2, 孙卓盈2, 梁 略2, 谭舒颖2
|
|
1.（ 通讯作者）：中山大学地理科学与规划
学院，中国区域协调发展与乡村建设研
究院，副教授，langw3@mail.sysu.edu.cn;2.中山大学地理科学与规划学院，硕士研究生
|
|
| 摘要: |
| 在实施城市更新行动的背景下，广州在
建设创新型城市的过程中，虽然提出强化中心城
区组群的科学研究与技术服务功能，但逐渐暴
露出空间不足、连片不明显、缺乏生活服务配套
设施等问题。社区是城市的基本功能单元，也是
城市更新的最小规划组团，因此探讨如何通过
社区更新推动创新空间发展具有重要意义。本
文通过对总体布局与典型案例的分析，在梳理
广州三类创新空间的空间集聚特征及主要影响
因素的基础上，探讨了社区型创新空间的发展模
式与规划策略：一、广州创新空间呈现出显著的
中心集聚与极化特征，不同类型的创新空间在特
征和影响因素上存在显著差异；二、以社区为空
间载体的更新规划是推动中心城区创新空间发
展与恢复创新活力的关键路径；三、社区型创新
空间可以分为产业主导型、知识驱动型和孵化
型三种类型，这三类创新社区在形成机制和空间模式上各具特色；四、结合规划编制与管理，以基于社区更新的空间功能单元推动规划实施传
导并促进创新社区建设。 |
| 关键词: 社区更新 创新社区 空间功能单元 社区规划 广州市 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240605 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（42471216、42371206） |
|
| A study on the development and planning strategies of innovation spaces driven bycommunity regeneration |
|
LANG Wei,FU Danhong,SUN Zhuoying,LIANG Lve,TAN Shuying
|
| Abstract: |
| With the implementation of the urban renewal movement, although the Guangzhou government
has proposed strengthening the scientific research and technical service functions of the central urban
districts in building an innovative city, obstacles such as insufficient space, discontinuity, and lack of
service facilities have been gradually exposed. As the basic functional unit of a city, a community is
also the primary planning cluster of urban renewal, so it is significant to explore how to promote the
development of innovation space through community renewal. Based on an analysis of the overall
layout and typical case studies, this paper explores the development models and planning strategies
for community-type innovation spaces by examining the spatial agglomeration characteristics and
main influencing factors of the three types of innovation spaces in Guangzhou: 1) Innovation spaces
in Guangzhou exhibit evident central agglomeration and polarization, with significant differences
in characteristics and influencing factors among the various types of innovation space; 2) Utilizing
community-based renewal planning is crucial for advancing innovation spaces in central urban
areas and revitalizing innovation activity; 3) Community-type innovation spaces can be categorized
into industry-oriented, knowledge-driven, and incubation-oriented, each type of which has distinct
formation mechanisms and spatial models; 4) Integrating spatial functional units through community
renewal with planning and management processes can facilitate the implementation and enable
transmission of planning, and promote the construction of innovation communities.
Community regeneration improves hardware facilities and services and focuses on creating
an inclusive soft environment. It supports the construction of innovation communities from
both physical and spiritual spaces. Through sustainable community regeneration in the central
urban area, various modes such as comprehensive renovation, micro renovation, and incremental
renovation are adopted to form a cluster of innovative elements with functions such as R&D, living,
culture, business, entertainment, and sports. Regarding functional layout, the development units of
“community+” have transformed from residential, tertiary, and industrial land to a mix of industrial,
commercial, and residential land. By vacating low-efficiency land use and revitalizing idle land
resources, the regeneration of existing inefficient space into innovation space transforms cities
into diverse and mixed innovation communities. The government leads community revitalization,
and the diverse social entities are stimulated to participate in innovation community planning,
renovation, construction, management, and operation, including market financing in later stages.
Particular attention should be paid to the needs of residents. The district government needs to form
a community regeneration plan and integrate it with innovation community development. Through
renovating and regenerating existing buildings and land use, technology and creativity groups are
attracted to settle in, and innovation returns to the central urban area, thereby a full vitality of old
cities grow prosperously and sustainably.
Innovation communities are spatial units with functions of technological innovation,leisure and entertainment, and living and residential. They are the basic composition units for building urban innovation spaces and promoting
high-quality development. Innovation communities are built as composite functional units for gathering science and technology industries and
innovative talents, forming an urban innovation space system. There are three types of innovation communities in the community regeneration mode:
industrial-led, knowledge-based, and incubation-oriented. In this case study, Guangzhou city has developed comprehensive control regulations,
i.e., renewal units and regulative detailed planning. However, at present, the two coexist, partially overlapping but not unified, and there is also a
problem of inconsistency with the community planning boundary. In the future, the community will be the basic spatial functional unit for planning
implementation, covering an average area of about 1-3 km2. The community with a small scope shall be merged, and the community with a large
scope shall be divided. Through community renewal, the development of innovation space, the demand for innovation talents, and the management of
innovation space are implemented at the community level.
Innovation spaces are becoming the key driving force for high-quality urban development in highly urbanized cities internationally. Urban innovation
development depends on spatial carriers regarding specific space and place. Different types and scales of innovation spaces constitute the urban innovation
ecological system. Communities are the basic units of urban development and governance, which also serve as a fundamental lever for urban renewal. In
the context of existing planning practices, community regeneration is critical to supplement the need for innovation spaces and promote high-quality urban
development. Therefore, to develop innovation urban spaces, it should actively encourage community renewal to enable the old urban areas to adapt to the
requirements of innovation functions, spaces, and groups. From the perspective of planning implementation, the future development of innovation spaces
needs to devote more efforts to promoting innovation communities, take renewal as the driving force, take communities as the spatial carrier, delineate the
community regeneration planning unit map, and form the mechanism of planning, construction, management and governance of innovation spaces based on
communities as the spatial functional unit. |
| Key words: community regeneration innovation community spatial function unit community planning Guangzhou city |
|
|
|
|
