引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 95次   下载 124 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
基于成都实践的城市社区更新多元共治模式探索 —以成华区社区规划设计节为例
赵 炜1, 陈怡可2, 李春玲3
1.四川大学建筑与环境学院,教授;2.四川大学建筑与环境学院,硕士研究生;3.( 通讯作者):四川大学建筑与环境学 院,讲师,158633142@qq.com
摘要:
随着公共理性和民主意识的提升,城市 更新目标从物质空间更新向满足多元利益需求 的空间环境和生活秩序转向,多元共治的更新 方法成为实现这一目标的有效途径。本文以五 届“城视·成画”社区规划设计节的实践历程为 线索,梳理了成都市在城市社区更新历程中的积 极探索,展示了“党建引领、政府搭台”“社区 牵头,组织代理”“居民自治,社会共建”的城市 社区更新多元共治模式。在这种模式支持下,成 都市的城市社区更新取得多元主体参与途径拓 宽,社区自治能力提升,社会专业组织加大支持 社区空间更新和协同治理力度,财政资金的投 放效率提高等显著成效。
关键词:  城市社区更新  多元共治  社区规划  规划设计节
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240606
分类号:
基金项目:成都市科技局技术创新研发项目(2024-YF05-00709- SN);四川省科技厅软科学项目(24RKX0388)
Exploration of the multi-actor governance model for urban community regeneration basedon Chengdu practices: A case study of Chenghua community planning and design festival
ZHAO Wei,CHEN Yike,LI Chunling
Abstract:
As China’s urbanization enters a phase of stock regeneration, urban community regeneration is shifting from a singular focus on spatial environment improvement to an integrated approach that combines spatial transformation with community governance. Within the broader context of urban stock planning and community development, urban community regeneration has evolved into a multidimensional initiative. This effort blends social work and spatial reconstruction to enhance community environments and promote sustainable development through a synthesis of urban regeneration and governance strategies. To address the diverse needs of stakeholders and achieve sustainable outcomes, various experimental approaches have emerged across China. These include the establishment of multistakeholder cooperation mechanisms, social organization-led initiatives, and co-governance frameworks under governmental leadership. However, several challenges persist, such as the underdevelopment of co-governance actors, incomplete co-governance mechanisms, and limited effectiveness in addressing the practical needs of residents. This study seeks to tackle these challenges by adopting the theoretical lens of multi-actor governance to evaluate its implementation in urban community regeneration both domestically and internationally. The analysis identifies the contrasting emphases between instrumental rationality prevalent in Western developed countries and the people-centered value rationality underpinning the Chinese context. Additionally, it examines Chengdu’s innovative practices in community regeneration, highlighting the city’s foundational systems for community governance, including the Community Governance Committee System, Community Planner System, and Grid Management System. These systems have enabled local governments and social organizations in Chengdu to develop a practice-oriented pathway for community regeneration, exemplified by planning and regeneration festivals designed to strengthen community self-governance. Among Chengdu’s diverse community regeneration initiatives, this study focuses on the Chengshi·Chenghua community planning and design festival in Chenghua District. Held five times to date, this festival represents a highly influential and exemplary case study. By tracing the festival’s progression, this research uncovers how Chengdu’s local practices align with the theoretical principles of multi-actor governance. The study introduces a research framework based on three interrelated elements-co-governance actors, co-governance mechanisms, and co-governance outcomes-that collectively articulate the will of urban co-governance and shape spatial environments to meet diverse community interests. Through the lens of this framework, the study examines the evolution of the Chengshi·Chenghua community planning and design festival. It highlights the festival’s trajectory from an initial trial of a three-tiered planner system to deeper involvement by social organizations and experts, the continuous empowerment of local regeneration talents, and the eventual formation of a multiactor governance model. The analysis underscores the developmental characteristics of this model, including an expanding scope of actor participation, the establishment of collaborative regeneration
Key words:  urban community regeneration  multi-actor governance  community planning  Planning and Design Festival