| 摘要: |
| 乡村文化治理在实现物质文明和精神
文化相协调发展的现代化转型背景下提出，成
为实现城乡融合和促进乡村社会可持续发展的
重要手段。当前，越来越多公共空间正在介入乡
村文化治理，但相关研究中缺少乡村公共空间对
文化治理实际效果转化具体路径的阐释工具，
也未明确识别出在乡村文化治理中起关键作用
的具体空间要素与组织形式。本研究构建“以文
化为中介的乡村公共空间与乡村文化治理关系”
的理论框架，并通过黔东南侗族村寨公共空间
的案例进行实证研究。研究具体分析了侗族村
寨公共空间的构成要素特征、组织方式特征，在
其反映出的空间向心性、组织层级性、对文化符
号的心理认同及对地方知识的代际传承等关键
文化内涵的基础上，进一步总结了“空间生产、
服务递送、治理嵌入、人心凝聚”四项治理关键路径，以期在理论拓展和未来实践两个层面上实现对“文化善治”的进一步探索。 |
| 关键词: 乡村公共空间 文化特征 文化治理 善治 侗族村寨 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240604 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:气候变化与碳中和国际合作联合行动 |
|
| Cultural characteristics of rural public spaces and implications for cultural governance: Acase study of Dong Villages in Southeast Guizhou Province |
|
XU Rongfang,GAO Mengyao,XU Yuanjing,ZHOU Zhengxu
|
| Abstract: |
| Accompanied by the impact of industrialization and urbanization, the urban-rural gap
continues to widen, presenting a development challenge faced by countries globally. Addressing the
imbalance in urban-rural development and the inadequate development of rural areas is a crucial
task in China's rural governance. Since the twentieth century, China has sequentially implemented
key initiatives such as the construction of a new socialist countryside, the development of beautiful
villages, and the integration of urban and rural areas. These efforts have effectively addressed
issues like environmental pollution, public facility shortages, and rural hollowing-out, while
also improving the overall rural environment. Rural cultural governance is proposed against the
backdrop of a modernization transformation aimed at harmonizing the development of material
civilization and spiritual culture, becoming an important means to achieve urban-rural integration
and promote the sustainable development of rural society. Rural public spaces, as the core domain
of rural cultural governance, play an irreplaceable role in maintaining and inheriting excellent
rural culture and nurturing the spiritual lives of residents. Currently, an increasing number of
public spaces are engaging in rural cultural governance, yet there is a lack of interpretive tools
in the related research to elucidate the specific pathways for the transformation of the actual
effects of rural public spaces on cultural governance. Additionally, the key spatial elements and
organizational forms that play a crucial role in rural cultural governance have not been clearly
identified. This study constructs a theoretical framework for the relationship between rural public
spaces a nd r ural cultural governance w ith culture a s t he i ntermediary. Within t he system of r ural
public spaces, the form of public spaces provides physical space support for public daily life and
social relations, serving the spiritual cohesion of villagers’ daily use needs and social interaction
processes. Simultaneously, public spaces are increasingly valued by rural culture, enabling the
spatial representation of rural culture through the rural public space system, thus forming a cultural
representation system of space.
Rural cultural governance utilizes the different attribute characteristics of the public space
system to implement effective protective measures and reasonable planning and construction of
public spaces in the material space. It also strengthens the connection of social relations and the
effective infusion of culture in the social and spiritual spaces, thereby forming four governance
pathways: spatial production, service delivery, governance embedding, and community cohesion.
The cultural characteristics of public spaces can provide insights for rural cultural governance,
which treats public spaces as the object of governance, stimulating the vitality of rural public
spaces and thus forming a virtuous cycle of governance. The study conducts empirical research
on the above framework through the case of public spaces in the Dong villages of Southeast
Guizhou. It specifically analyzes the characteristics of the elements and organizational forms of thepublic spaces in Dong villages. Based on key cultural connotations such as spatial centripetalism, organizational hierarchy, psychological identification
with cultural symbols, and intergenerational transmission of local knowledge, the study further summarizes the specific content of the four governance
pathways: systematic protection of rural public spaces as cultural carriers, emphasis on the organizational construction of the rural public life supply
system, provision of ideal locations for cultural governance, and enhancement of cultural identity and community cohesion. The research suggests that
rural public spaces are not only important venues for daily life but also a key medium for intervening in and influencing villagers' private lives, improving
intergenerational relationships, and maintaining and strengthening the sense of community in villages. They are the cornerstone of rural cultural heritage
and social vitality. Achieving "good cultural governance" through the reshaping of rural public spaces lies in organizing spatial elements with cultural
influence, providing the soil for the development of a soft governance model. Through the combined effect of the four pathways, public spaces become an
effective platform for rural governance, ultimately forming a positive feedback pattern between rural cultural subjectivity and the effectiveness of rural
governance. Furthermore, given the strong "empirical" nature of rural cultural governance, future research on rural public spaces should also develop
towards diachronic, dynamic, and reflective research, truly improving rural society through collaborative cultural governance. |
| Key words: rural public space cultural feature cultural governance good governance dong village cluster |
