| 摘要: |
| 健全乡村治理体系是乡村振兴战略的重
要组成部分。随着中国社会经济的发展，乡村治
理主体经历了从一到多的过程。为了提高乡村治
理的持续动力，如何实现乡村多元主体协同治理
值得深入探讨。选取珠江三角洲地区的凤和村与
非珠江三角洲地区的龙山塘村作为案例，通过实
地调研对两村进行比较分析；从协同治理理论
出发，综合国内外相关文献与中国实际情况整理
适于本研究的分析框架，研究协同治理模式及机
制。研究发现，凤和村属于强劲外生资本介入模
式，经济实力的强劲使得协同治理进行得较为顺
利，清晰有效的协议是其首要保障；龙山塘村则
是较强内生实力支撑模式，各主体之间的协同治
理趋于本土化。本研究为建立健全现代乡村社会
治理体制提供理论依据和实践参考。 |
| 关键词: 多元主体 协同治理 乡村振兴 凤和村 龙山塘村 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20230320 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家社会科学基金重点项目（21AZD034）；广东
省教育厅2019年度普通高校服务乡村振兴重点领域
专项（2019KZDZX2045） |
|
| Study on the Model and Mechanism of Rural Collaborative Governance: Based on the Comparative Analysis of Fenghe Village and Longshantang Village in Guangdong Province |
|
LANG Wei,CHEN Jinfeng,CHEN Tingting
|
| Abstract: |
| Improving the rural governance is an important part of the rural revitalization strategy put
forward at the 19th CPC National Congress in 2017. With the development of China’s social economy,
the participants of rural governance in China have experienced a process from single subject to multiple
subjects. After being placed under the overall leadership and control by the government, and with
state resources allocated to the grassroots level according to a plan, social grassroots management has
gradually developed into a positive situation where multiple actors, such as grassroots party organizations,
governments, mass self-governing organizations, social forces, and market forces, cooperate in
governance. This indicates that, with the participation of various parties, the quality and efficiency of
grassroots management have been improved, and a pattern of co-governance has been established.
The diversification of the main subject brings continuous impetus to rural governance. However, how
to realize the multi-subject cooperative governance in rural areas is worthy of further discussion. The
theory of collaborative governance originated in the West, and is a product that combines the theory of
collaboration from systems science with the governance theory in public administration. The theory
emphasizes the importance of collaboration, communication, and coordination among multiple non-state
stakeholders with diverse knowledge, skills, and perspectives, aiming at formulating or implementing
public policies or managing public projects, with a focus on achieving effective, equitable, and sustainable
outcomes. Learning from the theory of collaborative governance, the research tried to establish an
analytical framework which includes seven parts: background factors; collaborative processes (including
communication, mutual understanding, process commitment and trust building); system design;
collaboration (the intangible enhancement of intellectual, social and political capital); actual effect (the
improvement of tangible human settlement environment); feedback and adaptation. This framework
demonstrates how, given certain background factors, the collaborative process can achieve process
commitment and build trust through communication that leads to a shared understanding, facilitated by
institutional design. Ultimately, this leads to improved collaborative abilities and practical outcomes,
resulting in an upward spiral. The actual outcomes of collaboration feed back into the process, making
subsequent collaborations smoother and fitting the background factors more appropriately. This study
conducted an investigation into the collaborative governance model and mechanism, selecting Fenghe
Village in the Pearl River Delta region of Guangdong Province and Longshantang Village in the non Pearl River Delta region as cases. Fenghe Village is situated in the economically developed Pearl River
Delta region, and experienced economic growth due to its proximity to Guangzhou Baiyun International
Airport. On the other hand, Longshantang Village promoted economic development by highlighting
its ecological and cultural advantages in the less economically developed northern Guangdong region.
Despite having distinct economic development strategies, both villages have similarities in their macro
environment as they are adjacent to a tourist gathering area and have developed tourism. The study found
that Fenghe Village is characterized by a strong exogenous capital intervention model, which facilitates
smooth collaborative governance as well as clear and effective agreements as its primary guarantee.The developer plays a coordinating role, while the village committees actively cooperate with each other, and the government provides sufficient policy support,
thereby attracting social organizations. The parties involved carry out open and transparent cooperation through signed agreements and other systems, while micro transformation and village regulations significantly reduce coordination difficulties. On the other hand, Longshantang Village represents strong endogenous strength
support and localized collaborative governance among various subjects. The village committees actively explore the development path of Longshantang Village,
establishing economic cooperatives, and encouraging villagers to participate in village construction. The committees negotiate with villagers on intensive land
transfer and with cooperatives on villagers’ shares and land rent. The cooperatives attract outside capital through open agreements, while the village regulations
help villagers better understand village construction, thereby promoting village development. Overall, this study provides valuable insights into establishing
and perfecting modern rural social governance systems, highlighting the importance of effective collaboration among various stakeholders, through developer
coordination, government policy support, and clear agreements. The findings can facilitate rapid and sustainable economic development in rural areas and contribute
to the overall prosperity of these regions in China. |
| Key words: Multiple Subjects Collaborative Governance Rural Revitalization Fenghe Village Longshantang Village |
