摘要: |
乡村公共文化空间承载着乡土文化传
承、乡风文明建设和乡村社会治理等功用,是乡
村文化振兴的重要物质空间载体。随着乡村休闲
旅游经济的迅速发展,传统型和新型公共文化
空间在外来和内生文化资本的叠加作用下混合共
生。借鉴文化资本的作用原理和分类方式,根据
空间生成不同阶段的干预因素和作用特征,将乡
村公共文化空间识别为由具态化、物态化和制度
化文化资本主导的生产型空间、生活型空间及组
织型空间三种类型。在乡村旅游经济资本力量的
驱动下,公共文化空间在更新过程中产生消费化、
静态化和孤岛化等发展趋势。以湖南浏阳市农业
休闲旅游型竹联村美丽屋场营建为例,分析三类
公共文化空间物理场域和文化活动的存在特征,
探究文化资源向文化资本转化过程中的空间复合
化更新路径,进而提出弹性转化、多元化发展、整体式营建等更新策略,以期为其他类似乡村公共文化空间营建提供参考借鉴。 |
关键词: 竹联村 文化资源 乡村文化资本 乡村公共文化空间 |
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20220218 |
分类号: |
基金项目:湖南省创新型省份建设转向资助(2020TP1009) |
|
Research on the Renewal of Rural Public Cultural Space under the Guidance of CulturalCapital: A Case Study Based on the Construction of Beautiful Houses in Zhulian Village,Liuyang City |
LUO Jin,GAO Meixiang,YANG Ying,CHEN Hui
|
Abstract: |
With the diversified development of the rural economy, the new leading factors
represented by tourism enterprises are gradually increasing. The construction of cultural spaces
has been deeply affected by the development of the tourism industry. Consequently, rural cultural
resources are transformed, integrated and creatively utilised. Meanwhile, the traditional rural
public cultural space has entered the stages of weakening, transforming and reconstructing. From
the perspective of space production, this study explores the intervention mode and mechanism of
different cultural capital types acting on the physical field and the operation of cultural activities
in rural public cultural spaces. This is of great significance for the current research based on the
situation where the traditional and the modern rural public cultural spaces coexist.
Bourdieu put forward that cultural capital is the value accumulation of cultural labor
in the production field from the perspective of sociology. It exists in the three forms of
concretization, materialization and institutionalization, playing the roles of regulating,
framing and guaranteeing separately. Throsby further discussed the role of cultural capital in
economic production. He believed that cultural capital, embodied in tangible and intangible
forms, owns the value of cultural products. The two researchers emphasized that they can be
transformed into cultural capital only when cultural resources are activated and utilized. The
mutual transformation between cultural capital and cultural resources creates new values in
the production field and promotes the reproduction of cultural space. This also acts on the
generation, evolution, and renewal of rural public cultural spaces. The generation process of it
can be divided into three stages: the early planning stage, medium-term construction stage, and
later use stage. Referring to the existing forms of cultural capital, the main spatial intervention
factors in these stages can be summarized as follows: cultural talents, material resources and
cultural systems. Under the intervention of the three factors, rural public cultural spaces can
be identified as three types: the production spaces dominated by concrete cultural capital, the
living space dominated by material cultural capital and the organizational space dominated byinstitutional-cultural capital.While traditional agriculture is transformed into modern agriculture and the leisure tourism economy rises rapidly, the public cultural space
system of Zhulian village in Liuyang City has been continuously integrated and updated. This study has analysed the characteristics of the above
three space types in Zhulian village, considering cultural activities, such as space production and operation, life service, and cultural construction.
The production space has the compound characteristics of “agricultural production + cultural construction”. The living space has the compound
characteristics of “rural life + cultural construction”, and the organizational space has strong characteristics of cultural construction. Cultural
resource elements in Zhulian village, including cultural talents, physical resources and cultural systems, promote the reproduction of economic and
cultural values in the space field. Still, public cultural spaces generate consumption-oriented, static-oriented and island-oriented development trends,
reflected in the lack of experience in the production space, simple cultural activities in the living space, and separation of the organizational space
from the living environment.
Under the guidance of cultural capital, the composite renewal path of rural public cultural space was explored using a systematic method,
combining rural public cultural facilities with cultural activities in the physical field. On this basis, specific strategies were put forward for the three
cultural space types in the renewal and construction process of beautiful houses in Zhulian Village:
1) The elastic transformation of the production space included the elastic adjustment of closed industrial space and the combination of the
characteristic industrialization space with cultural space;
2) The diversified development of the living space focused on the diversified knowledge and skills training for rural subjects while also using the idle
endogenous cultural resources actively in renewing the rural neighborhood environment for the sustainable utilization of material cultural capital;
3) The integrated construction of the organizational space, such as the sharing of internal public spaces of the school, expanded the field scope
of the isolated organizational space and formed public cultural units around core space facilities, creating public cultural space corridors by linking
the landscape nodes.
As the cultural capital is a key factor leading the generation and renewal of rural public cultural spaces, it is necessary to make scientific use of
cultural capital theories to identify rural cultural resources, expand the capital base of rural cultural construction, and further consolidate the leading
position of the cultural capital in various cultural space types. This study is expected to provide references for the construction of other similar rural
public cultural spaces. |
Key words: Zhulian Village Cultural Resources Rural Cultural Capital Rural Public Cultural Space |