| 摘要: |
| 实现国土空间治理“ 数字化”
向“数智化”以至“数治化”转型，是空间
治理能力现代化的重要标志。在分析国土空
间数字化治理概念演变与界定其内涵特征的
基础上，借助 Citespace 软件对 2010—2023
年国内外已有研究成果进行可视化分析，对
比国内外研究差异。随后进一步明确当下我
国国土空间数字化治理在认知、技术、价值
等层面的诉求，明确提出新时期我国国土空
间数字化治理应实现从“等级线性”到“扁平
非标”的理念转变、从“时空锚定”到“流动
融合”的范式转变、从“零和博弈”到“责权
同构”的路径转变，研究结果可为加快推动
国土空间治理能力现代化提供思路借鉴。 |
| 关键词: 国土空间 数字化治理 研究进
展 现实诉求 逻辑转型 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20241223001 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目（52408085）；上海同济城市规划设计研究院有限公司暨长三角城市群智能规划协同创新中心科研课题（KY-2023-YB-A04） |
|
| Research progress, realistic demands, and logical transformation in digital governance ofnational territory space |
|
SHEN Jing,WANG Yifei,TAN Chang,ZHAI Duanqiang
|
| Abstract: |
| The digital transformation of territorial spatial governance has become a pivotal symbol of
modernizing national governance capacity. In the context of rapid technological advancement and
evolving governance demands, China is moving beyond basic “digitalization” to a more intelligent
and integrated model of “intelligent governance” driven by big data, AI, and systemic thinking. This
paper aims to systematically examine the conceptual evolution, current challenges, and transformation
logic of territorial spatial digital governance in China, with the goal of offering theoretical and
practical guidance for enhancing spatial governance capacity in the digital era.First, the study traces
the historical progression of spatial governance from early urban management practices to the
contemporary emphasis on holistic territorial spatial governance. It clarifies the conceptual
connotation of digital governance in this field, which involves not only the application of digital tools
for land use monitoring and planning but also the restructuring of governance objectives, processes,
and actor relationships. The paper defines digital territorial spatial governance as a governance model
characterized by multi-dimensional coordination, real-time data interaction, and value-driven
collaboration. Its key features include element-wide management, spatiotemporal integration, and
functional coupling across diverse governance subjects. Utilizing Citespace for bibliometric
visualization, the study analyzes 884 academic publications from 2010 to 2023, comprising 530
international (WOS) and 354 domestic (CNKI) research articles. The analysis reveals substantial
differences in focus areas: international studies emphasize dynamic land use management,
participatory digital platforms, and ecosystem-based governance, whereas domestic research tends to
focus on technical infrastructure construction, administrative regulation, and integration with
territorial spatial planning mechanisms. The comparison suggests a pressing need for China to shift
from a tool-oriented to a systemic and cognitive transformation of digital governance.Building on the
literature review, the paper identifies three major dimensions of current governance demands in
China: cognitive, technical, and value-based. Cognitively, current practices still rely heavily on linear,
top-down pl牡杮祮???琠?慡汲獡潤?敧浭灳栬愠獵楮穤敥獲?牳整晩潭牡浴楩湮杧?瑴桨敥?獣灯慭瑰楬慥汸?畴獹攠?据潤渠瑮牯潮氭?獩祮獥瑡敲浩??戠慯汦愠湳捰楡湴杩?摬攠癳敹汳潴灥浭敳渮琊?慥湣摨?灩牣潡瑬敬捹琬椠潴湨?瑲桥爠潥畸杩桳?晳氠敡砠業扩汳敭?捴潣浨瀠敢湥獴慷瑥楥潮渠?浨敥挠桲慡湰楩獤洠獥??癬慵汴畩敯?爠敯摦椠獤瑩牧楩扴畡瑬椠潴湥??慮湯摬?獧桩慥牳攠摡?慤挠捴潨略湩瑲愊扩楮汴楥瑧祲?慴浩潯湮朠?杮潴癯攠牧湯慶湥捲敮?慮捣瑥漠牷獯?kflows, often leading to fragmented systems and inconsistent data
quality. In terms of values, the governance framework lacks a robust mechanism for mutual trust
among government, market, and society, hindering cooperative action and inclusive decision-making.
To address these challenges, the study proposes a threefold transformation pathway for digital
territorial spatial governance in China: conceptual transformation from “hierarchical and linear”
to “flat and non-standard”. Traditional territorial spatial planning in China is often confined within the
rigid “five-level and three-type” structure, where top-down directives dominate and spatial plans are
standardized. The new approach advocates for a more adaptive, locally differentiated governance
logic that accommodates non-standard spatial scenarios and emphasizes full-cycle integration fromplanning, implementation to supervision through digital platforms. Paradigm Shift From “spatiotemporal anchoring” to “fluid integration”. Existing
governance paradigms prioritize fixed timeframes and predefined spatial zoning, which fail to respond to the dynamic nature of socio-spatial change. A new
paradigm leverages digital technologies to understand and respond to fluid interactions between physical space (“form”) and virtual flows (“flow”), integrating
macro-level spatial dynamics, meso-level human activity patterns, and micro-level design practices to support scenario-based, adaptive governance.Pathway
Adjustment From “zero-sum competition” to “co-construction of rights and responsibilities”. Previous governance efforts were often characterized by
fragmented departmental interests and jurisdictional conflicts. This paper suggests building a collaborative governance ecosystem where digital platforms
enable cross-boundary coordination, data sharing, and policy syne |
| Key words: national territory space digital governance research progress realistic demands logical transformation |
