引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 102次   下载 370 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
国内外“三生”空间的生态效应研究进展及在黄土沟壑区 流域的应用
侯全华1, 余洁2, 张令达3, 郑颖4
1.长安大学建筑学院,低碳城市空间与交通协同规划陕西省高校工程研究中心,教授,博士生导师;2.长安大学建筑学院,硕士研究生;3.(通讯作者):长安大学建筑学院,讲师,zhangld@chd.edu.cn;4.长安大学建筑学院,副教授
摘要:
在生态文明建设背景下,“三生” 空间作为人地系统交互的关键载体,其生态 效应研究已成为国土空间治理的前沿领域。 本文基于Bibliometrix 和CiteSpace 文献计量 工具,从研究进展、方法演进、实践应用三 个方面梳理国内外“三生”空间的生态效应 发展脉络。研究发现国际研究热点从土地利 用时空演变延伸至气候变化下的人地耦合研 究,国内则经历了“空间识别—时空演化— 生态效应评价”的深化路径;研究方法突破 传统静态数据限制,实现高分辨率遥感、多 时序历史数据等多源数据融合与多尺度建模 创新;实践应用呈现“单一空间管控—动态 过程模拟—特殊地理单元聚焦”的深化特 征,流域等特殊地理单元的人地关系协同研 究成为未来趋势。最后,提出构建综合研究 体系、建立流域“三生”空间与生态效应协 同反馈机制等建议,为流域空间协同与人地 关系的耦合研究提供支撑,对优化国土空间 治理具有重要指导意义。
关键词:  三生空间  土地利用变化  生态效 应  文献计量  黄土沟壑区流域
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240814004
分类号:
基金项目:十四五国家重点研发计划(2022YFC3802803);国家自然科学基金项目(52178030)
Research progress on the ecological effects of production-life-ecological space at homeand abroad and application in the yellow soil gully region basin
HOU Quanhua,YU Jie,ZHANG Lingda,ZHENG Ying
Abstract:
With the advancement of China’s ecological civilization construction, the productionliving- ecological space, as the spatial carrier for human activities, has gradually become the core link for regulating the interaction between the human system and the natural environment. Especially in regions with complex landforms and fragile ecosystems, such as the gully areas of the Loess Plateau, the production-living-ecological spaces within the region are significantly constrained by natural conditions, and the ecological effects brought about by spatial evolution exhibit distinct regional particularities. Therefore, in the context of the comprehensive establishment of the national spatial planning system, analyzing and summarizing the research progress on the ecological effects of production, living, and ecological spaces at home and abroad can help to deeply understand the interaction mechanism of space and its impact on regional sustainable development, reveal the diversity and regularity of ecological effects at different regions and scales, and provide important references for the optimization of national spatial planning in ecologically fragile areas. This study aims to comprehensively compare the research status and hotspots in the field of production-livingecological space and its ecological effects at home and abroad. By using bibliometric tools such as Bibliometrix and CiteSpace, and by reviewing 1 000 English-language articles from the WOS database and 1 138 Chinese-language articles from the CNKI database from 1998 to 2023, an academic map of the ecological effects of the production-living-ecological space is drawn. Through the methods of co-citation network, keyword co-occurrence clustering, and trend analysis, the spatiotemporal evolution patterns of this field are revealed from three dimensions: research progress, method evolution, and practical application. In terms of research hotspots, foreign keywords focus on areas such as “land use, spatio-temporal changes in land use, ecosystems, and climate change”, while domestic research started later and mainly focuses on “production-living-ecological space, ecological effects, national spatial planning, and spatial optimization”. In terms of research progress, the intensity of cooperation, continuity, systematicness, and interdisciplinarity of foreign research are significantly higher than those of domestic research. The evolution process of foreign research has gone through static, dynamic to comprehensive integration stages, and multiple spatio-temporal scale comprehensive simulation models have been established; domestic research is more concentrated on single-scale studies, such as administrative units and geographical units.The research findings are as follows 1) international research has shifted from spatio-temporal changes in land use to humanland coupling systems under climate change, with biodiversity conservation and ecosystem service assessment becoming recent focuses; Chinese research follows three stages, “space identificationspatio- temporal evolution-ecological effect evaluation”, which is highly consistent with the development of the national spatial planning system and environmental policies. 2) Research methodshave broken through the limitations of traditional static data, gradually introducing high-resolution remote sensing images, multi-temporal historical land use data, and socio-economic statistics, enhancing the ability to identify the dynamic evolution of the production-living-ecological space. At the same time, by combining multi-scale modeling techniques, simulation frameworks suitable for different spatial scales have been constructed, achieving refined analysis from spatial pattern identification to ecological effect evaluation, significantly improving the timeliness and practicality of research. 3) Practical applications show a deepening feature of “single-space control-dynamic process simulation-focus on special geographical units”, and the collaborative research on human-land relations in special geographical units such as river basins is becoming a future trend. How to construct a three-dimensional collaborative analysis framework of “topography-hydrology-human activities” in typical geographical units such as river basins and form a research paradigm for the collaborative mechanism of human-land relations in special geomorphic areas is becoming a frontier direction in national spatial planning optimization.
Key words:  production-life-ecological space  land use change  ecolodical effects  bibliometrics  loess gully watersheds