| 摘要: |
| 军垦工业遗产是中国工业遗产体
系中具有鲜明制度背景与集体记忆特征的
特殊类型，承载着特定历史阶段的生产方
式、空间形态和社会文化内涵，但在保护
利用实践中仍普遍存在价值识别简化、策
略针对性不足等问题。本文以军垦工业遗
产为研究对象，旨在构建兼顾价值评估和
策略生成的保护利用研究框架。研究从时
代价值、人文价值和本体价值三个维度建
立综合评价指标体系，采用层次分析法与
模糊综合评价法对遗产价值进行量化识
别，并在综合评价结果基础上引入价值结
构分析。研究表明，军垦工业遗产在三维
价值结构上存在显著差异，不同价值结构
类型对应不同的保护介入强度与更新导
向，应在整体保护等级判定的基础上，结
合主导价值与失衡维度，形成差异化的保
护重点与更新策略。本文研究有助于提升
军垦工业遗产保护利用决策的科学性与可
操作性。 |
| 关键词: 军垦工业遗产 保护利用 价值
评估 更新设计 价值结构 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20251128004 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目（52578051） |
|
| Research on the conservation, utilization assessment, and renewal design strategies ofmilitary reclamation industrial heritage: A case study of the Shihezi Nanshan CementPlant Renovation |
|
LI Xiangyu,YU Mengyun,WANG Dan
|
| Abstract: |
| Military reclamation industrial heritage constitutes a distinctive and irreplaceable component
of China’s industrial heritage system. Formed under specific historical conditions associated with frontier
development, national defense, and the institutional framework of the Xinjiang Production and
Construction Corps, this type of heritage integrates industrial production, collective organization, social
governance, and everyday life. Unlike conventional industrial heritage shaped primarily by technological
evolution or industrial typology, military reclamation industrial heritage embodies a highly intertwined
structure of historical missions, institutional practices, spatial organization, and collective memory.
However, in current conservation and adaptive reuse practices, such heritage is often addressed through
generalized industrial heritage evaluation frameworks, resulting in oversimplified value recognition and
insufficiently targeted renewal strategies. In particular, existing approaches tend to focus on
comprehensive value scores while paying limited attention to how different value dimensions interact and
how evaluation results can effectively guide conservation decision-making and design interventions. This
study aims to construct an integrated conservation and utilization framework for military reclamation
industrial heritage that links value assessment with strategy generation. By responding to the specific
historical and cultural characteristics of military reclamation heritage, the research seeks to overcome the
limitations of score-oriented evaluation approaches and to establish a more operational and decisionoriented
methodology for conservation and adaptive reuse. The study emphasizes that, for heritage types
characterized by strong institutional backgrounds and collective memory, evaluation results should not
merely serve as a basis for ranking value levels, but should instead function as a mechanism for guiding
differentiated conservation interventions and renewal strategies. Based on a comprehensive review of
existing literature on industrial heritage conservation and value assessment, this paper establishes a threedimensional
evaluation framework consisting of historical value, humanistic value, and intrinsic value.
These three dimensions correspond respectively to the historical and institutional background of heritage
formation, the social and cultural meanings embedded in collective memory and everyday practices, and
the physical condition and spatial characteristics of the built fabric. Rather than treating these dimensions
as isolated attributes, the framework emphasizes their interrelated structure, reflecting the holistic nature
of military reclamation industrial heritage as a “production – life – organization – memory” system. To
operationalize this framework, the study employs the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine
indicator weights and applies the Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method to quantify the performance
of heritage sites across the three value dimensions. The methodological procedures are applied to a case
study of the Nanshan Cement Plant in Shihezi City, a representative military reclamation industrial
heritage site that preserves a relatively complete industrial spatial structure but faces significant
constraints related to physical deterioration and reuse feasibility. The evaluation results indicate that,while the site demonstrates strong historical value and moderate humanistic value, its intrinsic value is comparatively constrained due to structural degradation
and safety concerns. Beyond determining an overall evaluation level, this study introduces value structure analysis as a key step for interpreting evaluation
results and translating them into conservation and renewal decisions. The comprehensive evaluation level is used to define the baseline and priority of
conservation intervention, while the value structure—namely, the relative dominance and imbalance among historical, humanistic, and intrinsic values—serves
as the primary basis for determining intervention intensity and strategic orientation. As illustrated by the value-structure-oriented technical framework proposed
in this study, sites with different value structures require differentiated conservation approaches, even when their comprehensive evaluation levels are similar.
The case analysis indicates that the Nanshan Cement Plant should be identified as a military reclamation industrial heritage site characterized by constrained
intrinsic value, for which large-scale restoration or high-intensity functional reuse would involve substantial risks and implementation costs. In response to this
value structure, the study proposes a conservation strategy oriented toward overall spatial preservation and differentiated intervention. Priority is given to
retaining key industrial structures, production-related spatial relationships, and site-scale integrity, while low-intensity and reversible design measures are
adopted to support the interpretation of historical narratives and the continuation of collective memory. This strategy emphasizes minimum necessary
intervention, addresses essential structural safety requirements, and preserves the legibility of the industrial system at the site level.The research findings further
confirm that value structure analysis functions as a critical intermediary mechanism linking value assessment with strategy formulation. By explicitly
associating evaluation outcomes with conservation intervention intensity and renewal design orientation, the proposed framework helps to avoid homogenized
reuse approaches and reduces the risk of overlooking socially significant but less visually prominent heritage values. Overall, this study contributes to the
methodological advancement of industrial heritage conservation by illustrating how multi-dimensional value assessment can be systematically translated into
practical and decision-oriented conservation tools. The framework provides a transferable reference for the conservation and adaptive reuse of military
reclamation industrial heritage, as well as other industrial heritage types shaped by complex historical, institutional, and social contexts. |
| Key words: military reclamation industrial heritage conservation and adaptive reuse value assessment renewal design value structure |
