| 摘要: |
| 土地发展权是我国空间治理体系的
重要理论工具，贯穿国土空间规划的编制、
实施和管理的全过程。随着国家治理体系和
治理能力现代化进入新的历史阶段，围绕土
地发展权的空间治理研究引发了学界的广泛
关注。为深入探讨土地发展权与空间政策间
的相互作用关系，并明晰其研究演进特征，
通过信息可视化工具CiteSpace，对1994—
2023 年间土地发展权研究文献进行梳理，分
析土地发展权研究在不同空间政策背景下的
动态变化趋势。结合可视化图谱与传统的文
献计量学方法，概述了中国土地发展权研究
的三个主要阶段：以土地为中心的城镇化阶
段；“多规合一”的空间用途管制阶段；以
及强调生态治理，土地发展权逐步向中央政
府收束的阶段。通过梳理既有的研究成果，
总结了中国土地发展权研究的演进特征，并
对国土空间规划体系下土地发展权未来的研
究热点进行展望。 |
| 关键词: 土地发展权 信息可视化 空间用
途管制 演进特征 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240516001 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:陕西省重点研发计划（2025NC-YBXM-323） |
|
| Thirty-year research progress and evolutionary characteristics of land development rightsin China: Bibliometric analysis based on visualization |
|
DUAN Degang,ZENG Hongyu,WANG Jin
|
| Abstract: |
| The concept of land development rights is a crucial theoretical framework in China’s
spatial governance system, playing a significant role throughout the processes of land use planning,
implementation, and management. As China progresses into a new phase of governance
modernization, the relationship between land development rights and spatial policies has attracted
considerable scholarly attention. This paper explores the dynamic interactions between land
development rights and spatial policies, with the goal of clarifying the evolution of research in this
field. Utilizing CiteSpace, an information visualization tool, this study systematically reviews the
literature on land development rights from 1994 to 2023, examining how the research has evolved
under various spatial policy contexts. By combining visual maps generated through CiteSpace with
traditional bibliometric methods, the study identifies three primary stages in the research on land
development rights in China: the land-centered urbanization phase, the phase of spatial land-use
control under the “integration of multiple plans”, and the phase emphasizing ecological governance,
with land development rights gradually centralizing within the central government. First, the
intertwining of institutional design and the progression of land development rights research reveals
the complexity of policy development. This highlights the need for integrated approaches to address
both land rights and spatial policy simultaneously. Second, the ongoing erosion of rural land
development rights, alongside the growing disparities between different rural areas, has become an
increasingly pronounced trend. The loss of land development rights in rural areas, coupled with the
expanding differences between regions, further exacerbates the inequality in land access and
utilization. This trend highlights the intensification of rural-urban and intra-rural disparities,
underscoring the urgent need for policy measures that address these imbalances and ensure more
equitable land rights protection across all rural communities. Third, the inadequacy of compensation
mechanisms for land development rights has led to significant regional inequities. This trend points to
the need for comprehensive reforms in compensation systems to ensure fair and equitable distribution
of land-related benefits, especially in rural areas. Moreover, this paper provides an outlook on the
future directions of land development rights research within the national spatial planning framework.
It anticipates that future studies will focus on three key areas. The first is spatial development research
centered on spatial planning disciplines, which will explore how land development rights interact with
national and regional spatial development strategies. This research will examine the role of land rights
in shaping the urban-rural development landscape and will focus on sustainable land use practices.
The second area of focus is urban and rural spatial governance during the era of land stock updates.
As China continues to address issues of land redistribution, urban renewal, and rural revitalization,
this research will examine governance mechanisms that manage land development rights across
different spatial contexts, aiming to mitigate regional inequalities. The third research direction
involves integrating qualitative theoretical studies with spatial layout simulations. This approach willallow scholars to bridge the gap between theory and practice, offering new perspectives on how to optimize land development rights within spatial governance
frameworks. Together, these research areas will offer a comprehensive understanding of land development rights within China’s spatial governance framework.
This paper suggests that land development rights research will be critical in addressing challenges related to urban-rural integration, ecological sustainability,
and equitable development. The integration of land development rights into spatial policies will be fundamental to advancing China’s goal of achieving
balanced and sustainable development. By fostering more efficient land governance mechanisms, these studies will contribute to overcoming existing
challenges in spatial planning and ensuring that land use benefits are distributed more equitably. In conclusion, this paper underscores the continued importance
of research on land development rights within the context of China’s evolving spatial governance system. As it refines its national spatial planning policies, the
development of effective governance mechanisms to manage land development rights will become increasingly important. Understanding the complex
relationships between land rights, governance structures, and regional disparities will be key to formulating policies that foster equitable and efficient land use
strategies. Therefore, land development rights research will remain integral to shaping policies that promote sustainable and inclusive growth in both urban and
rural areas across China. By focusing on the relationship between spatial policies and land development rights, future studies will provide valuable insights for
the continued advancement of China’s land governance framework, ensuring that land development benefits all regions fairly and equitably. This study
provides a framework for future policy development and scholarly inquiry, facilitating deeper exploration of the interactions between land development rights,
spatial governance, and equitable land distribution in China. |
| Key words: land development rights information visualization spatial use control evolutionary features |
