| 摘要: |
| 大都市周边地区的乡村在城市化进程
中逐渐走向衰退甚至消亡，为克服既往研究当中
存在的主观性偏向，引入层次分析法与熵值法
相结合的主客观组合赋权法，从乡村特色产业
发展的内生潜力、外部赋能与支撑保障三个层面
入手，构建其发展水平评估模型。研究发现大都
市周边乡村地区的特色产业和外部赋能发展总
体水平一般，且支撑保障发展水平较差。针对
上述问题，提出推动乡村特色产业发展形式集
群化、发展重点差异化、发展内容个性化、发
展思路协同化、发展流程现代化等目标实现的
方法，以期为大都市周边的乡村特色产业发展提
供参考。 |
| 关键词: 乡村振兴 特色产业 评估 组合赋权法 大都市地区 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240608 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目（52378076）；西安建筑
科技大学2023年度新型城镇化专项研究基金项目
（2022SCHZ05） |
|
| Evaluation of the development level of rural characteristic industries around metropolisesbased on combination weighting method: Taking Xi’an as an example |
|
ZHANG Mengjiao,ZHANG Pei,FU Xiaomeng
|
| Abstract: |
| With the advancement of urbanization, most of the villages around the metropolis are facing
signs of decline, and the revitalization and subsequent sustainable development of villages can be
effectively promoted by taking the characteristic rural industries as the key and the industrialization of
characteristic resources as the path. At the same time, in-depth assessment of the development level of
rural characteristic industries at the stage of development of rural characteristic industries is of great value
and significance in exploring the crux of the development of rural industries and improving the quality
and level of the development of their characteristic industries. Meanwhile, in the research process of this
paper, the combination assignment method is utilized to overcome the subjectivity bias that exists in the
previous research, therefore, the subjective and objective combination assignment method that combines
the hierarchical analysis method and entropy value method is adopted, which makes the assessment
results more scientific and more reliable.
The overall assessment framework is based on the three levels of “endogenous potential”,
“external empowerment” and “support and guarantee” of the development of rural specialty
industries, and constructs the assessment model of its development level. Model. The dimension
of “endogenous potential” is the core evaluation content for the development of rural characteristic
industries, which involves the three aspects of production efficiency, employment driving level and
economic development of rural characteristic industries; the dimension of “external empowerment”
mainly includes the two aspects of support driving and modernization; the dimension of “basic
guarantee” mainly includes the two aspects of “support driving” and “support guarantee”. The
dimension of “external empowerment” mainly includes support and modernization level; the
dimension of “basic guarantee” involves the construction of facilities and location and transportation.
The study finds that the overall level of development of special industries in rural areas around
metropolitan cities is average, and at the system level, the overall score of endogenous potential is
high, including the high score of economic development, which in turn drives the development of
endogenous potential, while the scores of labor force level and production efficiency are both low.
The external empowerment dimension has the next highest level of scores, with more balanced scores
in the support and modernization dimensions. The lowest scores are in the area of infrastructure
security. The scores for both facility construction and location and transportation are low. In terms
of longitudinal comparison at the guideline level, the economic development scores account for a
larger proportion and have a greater impact on the rural characteristic industry, followed by the
level of support and modernization. The lower development levels are labor level, location and
transportation, production efficiency, and facility construction. And there is a big difference between
different types of featured industries in the countryside, with the overall development level of
featured tourism villages being higher, followed by featured planting, featured food and featured
breeding, and the development level of featured handicrafts being weaker.
Therefore, in the light of the results of the development level assessment and the core problems
of the response, it proposes a strategy to improve the overall development level, which is mainlydivided into enhancing the endogenous potential, which mainly includes the innovation of industrial subjects and the improvement of the management and
organization system of featured industries; strengthening the external empowerment through the enhancement of the level of network sales; and improving
the basic security, which is mainly achieved by strengthening the construction of basic and public service facilities and building the advantageous featured
industry clusters. Meanwhile, in terms of improving the basic guarantee, it is mainly realized by strengthening the construction of infrastructure and public
service facilities and building advantageous industrial clusters. It also proposes suitable strategies to improve the level of industrial development for different
types of villages, which are divided into three levels according to the level of development, i.e., better level of development, medium level of development
and poor level of development of villages with various types of specialty industries, and puts forward differentiated guidelines and adaptive planning in turn.
In order to promote the realization of the goals of clustering the development form, differentiating the development focus, personalizing the development
content, synergizing the development idea and modernizing the development process of rural characteristic industries, with a view to providing references
for the development of rural characteristic industries around the metropolis. |
| Key words: rural revitalization characteristic industries evaluation combination weighting method metropolis |
