| 摘要: |
| 文化治理是空间规划融入国家治理体
系的重要途径，将文化治理视角引入城乡规划
研究极具现实意义。本文从文化价值和文化治
理理论的本源入手，系统梳理文化治理视角下
的城乡规划研究趋势，构建“制度—社会—经
济”分析框架，总结其理论源流和主要论域。研
究发现，制度层面的研究关注文化政策干预城
乡空间营造的转变过程，社会层面的研究着重
通过文化措施营建治理共同体的方法，经济层
面的研究强调文化治理带来的经济价值以及对
于存量空间治理的综合效益提升作用。同时也发
现，既有研究存在理论方法建构缺失、规划融
合定位不明、技术依托明显不足的缺陷。结合
面向治理的国土空间规划目标，认为将文化治理
纳入城乡规划理论方法建构、融入国土空间规
划体系的实施路径、依托智慧技术促进城乡文化资产的摸底和可持续发展是当下和未来的研究前沿与热点。 |
| 关键词: 文化治理 城乡规划 国土空间规划 文化价值 文化规划 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240601 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:重庆市自然科学基金面上项目（c s tc2021jcyj -
msxmX1055）；重庆市研究生教育“课程思政”
示范课程、教学名师和示范教学团队建设项目
（YKCSZ23016）；教育部学位与研究生教育发展中
心2023年度主题案例项目（ZT-231061143） |
|
| A review of urban and rural planning research from the perspective of cultural governance:Theoretical origins, main theory fields and future prospects |
|
HUANG Ling,LI Haoyu
|
| Abstract: |
| Cultural governance is an important pathway for integrating spatial planning into the
national governance system. Introducing the perspective of cultural governance into the field of urban
and rural planning has significant practical implications for improving the spatial governance system,
promoting sustainable urban and rural development, and achieving urban spiritual rejuvenation.
Urban and rural planning research is rooted in social practice, while social processes highlight the
tension and synergy of culture. Understanding contemporary urban and rural planning requires
integrating the paradigm of cultural governance with spatial practice research. This study starts
from the essence of cultural value, analyzes the connotation of cultural governance, and suggests
that cultural governance, on the one hand, focuses on managing urban and rural cultural phenomena
to enhance cultural value and its extensions and, on the other hand, uses cultural value as a guide to
achieve diversified governance goals for urban and rural areas. Governance encompasses four key
attributes: processuality, coordination, multi-sectorality, and sustained interaction, with culture playing
an indispensable role throughout. Fully activating the governance functions of culture is essential for
maximizing its foundational role. The study posits that the concept of cultural governance emphasizes
both culture as an object of governance and a tool for governance. To clarify the research framework,
this study employs bibliometric software CiteSpace to generate keyword clustering and burst detection
visualizations, describing international and domestic research trends. Research on urban and rural
planning from the perspective of cultural governance emerged widely in the 1990s and has shown an
overall upward trend, with increasingly diversified research themes. Based on the functional aspects
of cultural governance, this study constructs a general analytical framework of “regime-societyeconomy”
for urban and rural planning research under the lens of cultural governance, analyzing
research directions and domains. Firstly, the institutional function of culture has played a crucial role
in China’s urban growth process. Shifts in the understanding of “culture” and “cultural resources”
reflect the transition from cultural policy research to cultural space creation studies. Research on
cultural governance in the context of territorial space primarily explores strategies for the coordination
of diverse governance actors and the interaction between cultural and ecological governance at the
territorial level. Secondly, cultural governance also involves applying cultural elements as social
capital in networked governance, emphasizing the role of culture in bridging community differences.
Empowering grassroots governments in governance is key to public participation in urban and rural
planning practices, while rural cultural governance and cultural space construction reflect the strategic
value of rural revitalization and maintain rural community stability. Thirdly, cultural governance
is crucial for activating economic value and improving the efficiency of existing spaces. Measures
related to cultural governance are regarded as foundational for addressing social issues and economic
growth imbalances. Culture-oriented urban renewal actions require a profound understanding of the
urban cultural context and its evolutionary process, balancing social and economic benefits. The studyconcludes that with intensifying social issues and a shift toward human-centered stock governance, cultural governance measures have become a concrete
approach to addressing urbanization challenges in China. Innovation in urban and rural planning, based on recognizing cultural value, effectively responds to
spatial diversity and differentiation. Existing studies have thoroughly acknowledged the decisive role of culture in the urban and rural planning process oriented
toward stock space governance, showing interdisciplinary and multi-issue integration trends. Planning practices under the context of stock space governance
directly address the public’s aspiration for a better life, and cultural capacity and awareness are prerequisites for advancing urban and rural planning into
public policy. Existing researches on cultural governance perspectives in urban and rural planning exhibit both practical application and theoretical orientation.
Given the discipline’s nature and extensive practice, case-based practical research is a focal point in China’s urban and rural spatial cultural governance, while
theoretical studies face challenges from the influence of Western industrial culture, constrained by social contexts and unable to fully meet the demand for
national cultural confidence. Compared to developed countries such as the United States and Canada, which have long integrated cultural planning and cultural
spatial planning into urban development policies or urban-rural planning, cultural governance in China’s planning system remains ambiguous. Moreover, while
current research has conducted quantitative analyses of cultural value measurement, the impact of cultural elements on governance outcomes, and the role of
cultural governance across urban sectors, practice largely relies on static data and shows limited sensitivity to the use of intelligent technological tools. Thus,
this study proposes three research prospects: constructing theoretical methodologies for urban and rural planning research under the perspective of cultural
governance, exploring methods for integrating cultural governance into territorial spatial planning systems, and leveraging intelligent technologies to facilitate
cultural asset inventory and sustainable development. It aims to uncover the cultural potential embedded in spaces, transform it into cultural momentum, and
ultimately coordinate planning, construction, and governance from a cultural perspective. |
| Key words: cultural governance urban and rural planning territorial spatial planning cultural values cultural planning |
