| 摘要: |
| 土地集约利用评价作为重要的土地资
源管理工具，对于土地资源的可持续利用和促
进经济、生态、社会的协调发展具有重要意义。
本文从宏观尺度进行城市土地集约利用情况的
分类识别与横向比较研究，以江汉平原地区21个城市中心城区为研究对象，通过遥感解析与地理信息数据分析方法批量识别城市建设用地，
在此基础上，构建多层次多维度的土地集约利用评价指标体系，运用熵权法以及K-means聚类分
析方法对上述中心城区土地集约利用程度进行分类，揭示市级城市、省直管城市、县级城市等不
同行政级别管辖差异下中心城区土地集约利用的分异情况，为城市因地制宜制定土地集约利用政
策提供依据。 |
| 关键词: 建设用地 节约集约利用评价 熵权法 中心城区 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240418 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（51908232）；湖北
省科技创新人才及服务专项软科学研究项目（2022
EDA052）；国家自然科学基金青年基金项目（5220
8088）；2023年湖北省社会科学基金重点项目暨省新
型智库项目（HBSKJJ2023146）；国家自然科学基金
青年基金项目（52108035） |
|
| Research on classification and identification of land intensive use in plain city: Evaluationof 21 cities and counties in Jianghan Plain based on entropy weight method |
|
LIN Ying,ZHANG Xian,LU Youpeng,ZHU He
|
| Abstract: |
| The evaluation of intensive land use is an important tool to evaluate the degree of land
intensive use. It is of great significance for realizing the sustainable use of land resources and
promoting the coordinated development of economy, ecology and society. In recent years, research
on the evaluation of intensive urban land use at home and abroad has mainly focused on urban
agglomerations, provinces, cities and other scales in terms of research scale, and mainly involves
developed coastal cities or provinces with strong economic foundations. There is a lack of research
on cities at different administrative levels. A comparative study of intensive land use. In fact, under
China’s land development rights allocation framework, which centers on the level-by-level allocation
of land use indicators, cities at different administrative levels enjoy unequal land development
rights. Specifically, cities with higher administrative levels have a stronger say in the allocation of
land use indicators, and can obtain relatively more indicators for new urban construction land and
fewer indicators for cultivated land protection tasks. However, it remains to be revealed what the
differences are in the degree of intensive land use in cities at different administrative levels, and
whether high-level cities with more say in urban construction land indicators show higher degrees of
intensive land use. Therefore, this article selects Xiaogan City, Jingzhou City, Jingmen City, Tianmen
City, Xiantao City, and Qianjiang City in the Jianghan Plain of Hubei Province as the research
area. Xiaogan City, Jingzhou City, and Jingmen City are prefecture-level cities, and Tianmen City,
Xiantao City, Qianjiang City is a city under the direct administration of the province. A total of six
cities, nine county-level cities and the central urban areas of six county towns are used as research
samples. From a macro scale, the classification, identification and horizontal comparison of intensive
urban land use are studied, and through remote sensing analysis, use the geographical information
data analysis method to identify construction land areas in batches to accurately extract the research
scope. On this basis, 12 indicators (area average) were selected from three aspects: land input
intensity, land utilization degree, and land output benefit. Investment in fixed assets, general public
budget expenditures per area, urban employees per area, u湲摢?楮渠灣畯瑮?楴湲瑵散湴獩楯瑮礠??瑮桤攠?汲慥湡搠?楥湲瀠畣瑡?楩湴瑡攬渊獰楯瑰祵?獡桴潩畯汮搠?扥敮?慩灴灹爬漠灲牯楡慤琠敮汥祴?楯湲捫爠敤慥獮敳摩?瑹漬?浯慵歴数?瑴栠敶?瑬桵牥攠敯?琠祳灥散獯?潤晡?楹渠摡敮硤?獴瑥牲畴捩瑡畲特攠獩?浤潵牳整?物敥慳猠潰湥慲戠污敲???漊牦?敳硣慡浬瀠汲敥??瑮桵敥?杰潥癲攠牡湲浥敡測琠?睩慳湰瑯獳?瑢潬?椠湩据牣敯慭獥攠?汥慲渠摣?楰湩癴敡猠瑯浦攠湵瑲?獡瑮爠敲湥杳瑩桤敥湮?敳昬映潔牨瑥猠?瑶潥?楡湧捥爠整慯獴敡?挠慲灥楴瑡慩汬?楳湡癬敥獳琠浯敦渠瑣?楮湳?業湥晲爠慧獯瑯牤畳挬琠畧牲敥??瀠畣扯汶楥捲?晧慥挠楲污楴瑥椬攠獡?慤渠摳?晷楡硧敥搠?慲獥獡整瑭獥??映潲牡?捥椩琠楷敥獲?眠極瑳桥?栠楴杯栠?汯慮湳摴?極湣癴攊獡瑮洠敥湶瑡?極湡瑴敩湯獮椠瑩祮?慥湸搠?汹潳睴?汭愠湦摯?甠瑩楮汴楥穮慳瑩楶潥渠??瑢桡敮礠?獡桮潤甠汵摳?椠湩据爠整慨獥攠?瑩桡敮楧牨?畮爠扐慬湡?灮漠灡畲汥慡琬椠潡湮?搠整湨獥椠瑥祮??牯潰慹摷?湩敧瑨睴漠牭步?摨敯湤猠楡瑮祤??攭瑭捥???愠灣灬牵潳灴牥楲愠瑡敮污祬?杳畩楳搠敭?灴潨灯畤氠慷瑥楲潥渠?摳楥獤琠牴楯戠畣瑬楡潳湳?瑦桹爠潴畨来栠?灥潧汲楥捥椠敯獦??慮湴摥?楳湩捶牥攠慬獡敮?椠湵癳敥猠瑩浮攠湴瑨?椠湡?楯湶晥爭慭獥瑮牴畩捯瑮略牤攠?捥潮湴獲瑡牬甠捵瑲楢潡湮?晡畲湥摡獳? The
research aims to reveal the differentiation of intensive land use in central urban areas under different administrative levels such as municipal cities, provincial
cities, and county-level cities, and provide support for cities to promote high-quality development according to local conditions. The evaluation results
show: 1) the urban intensive evaluation results of municipal-level urban districts are two moderate utilization and one low utilization; 2) the urban intensive
evaluation results of provincial-level cities and districts are all low utilization; 3) the urban intensive evaluation results of the first-level urban area are four
intensive utilization, five moderate utilization, and six low utilization. That is, the central urban areas of cities (prefecture-level cities, provincial-level cities)
with higher administrative levels in the Jianghan Plain area have lower intensive land utilization; while the central urban areas (counties) of cities with lower
administrative levels have less intensive land utilization. To this end, it is recommended that central urban areas of municipal-level cities need to further
strengthen the intensive and economical use of land, strictly control urban spatial growth boundaries, optimize urban spatial structure, clarify the focus of
urban development, improve the sharing and aggregation effect of various facilities, and avoid blind spread of urban space. For cities with high land output
benefits and low la |
| Key words: construction land evaluation of economical and intensive use entropy weight method city center |
