引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 301次   下载 960 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
高质量发展背景下的存量空间规划和治理体系 ——以内江市实践为例
陈珊珊1, 王 健2
1.(通讯作者):北京清华同衡规划设 计研究院有限公司,高级工程师, koala3@126.com;2.北京清华同衡规划设计研究院有限公 司,教授级高级工程师
摘要:
我国过去的城镇发展主要着眼于增量 空间,在严格保护耕地和土地资源紧约束的要 求下,对城镇存量空间规划和治理的系统性研 究是新时期构建高质量发展的国土空间格局、 推动国土空间治理体系改革的关键所在和紧迫 需要。本文从土地规划管理、城市建设两方面 系统回顾了我国城镇存量空间规划和治理工作 的历程,在总结存量空间规划和治理相关的研 究成果、难点问题的基础上,提出未来存量空 间规划应以高质量发展和资源管理为导向,聚 焦“三闲四低”等城镇中亟需提质增效的区域, 系统建构从利用调查—评价识别—划定重点单 元—优化利用—配套制度的全流程技术体系。 在调查评价和单元划定环节,应抓好评价标准构建、利用调查、图斑核查三大流程,在此基础上划定存量空间提升的重点单元;在优化利用环 节,应以实施为导向建构针对不同类型存量空间综合提升方法;在配套制度环节,应将 “存量” 思维嵌入国土空间规划和治理全流程,重点在调查监测、规划编制、开发利用、生态修复、监督 检查等五大环节加强存量空间相关的政策和制度设计。最后结合内江市典型城市案例对技术方法 予以实例验证。
关键词:  城镇存量空间规划和治理  技术体系  调查评价  优化利用  制度建设
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20230312
分类号:
基金项目:
Stock Space Planning and Governance System Under the Background of High-Quality Development: Taking Neijiang Practice as an Example
CHEN Shanshan,WANG Jian
Abstract:
In the past, China’s urban development mainly focused on incremental space. In the context of strict protection of arable land and tight constraints on land resources, the traditional growth model has become unsustainable. Systematic research on stock space planning and governance is not only a national strategic requirement to support high-quality development, but also an important task of scientifically planning the spatial pattern of land in the new era and promoting the reform of the spatial governance system. According to the existing practice, the planning and governance of urban stock space in China was mainly carried out from two aspects: land management, and urban construction. Land management is mainly aimed at improving the quality and efficiency of specific types of land, such as idle land, inefficient land, etc. Urban construction mainly focuses on urban regeneration, that is, optimizing and adjusting the functions and improving the quality of all urban built-up areas. Through two aspects of work, China has accumulated a series of experiences in the planning and governance of urban stock space, but there are also problems such as the complex definition and type of stock space, the difficulty in forming unified standards for the evaluation and development and utilization of stock space resources, the complex relationship between interest claims and property rights involved, and the lack of systematic establishment of relevant governance systems. According to the existing research, the research on inventory space under the old institutional framework has been quite comprehensive, but after China enters the period of land space planning and governance system reform, there is still a lack of relevant research and reflection on how to build a systematic inventory evaluation, planning, utilization, governance methods and system under the new institutional framework. Based on past relevant work experience and research results, and combining common types of land management and urban regeneration, this article believes that the stock space can be summarized into seven types of land, including “three idle” and “four low”. “Three idle” mainly refers to land approved but not provided, idle land provided but not under construction, idle land, etc; “Four low” mainly refers to inefficient industrial warehousing land, inefficient residential land, inefficient commercial land, and other inefficient land. In the context of tight resource constraints and high-quality development, the focus of future incremental space is on “control”, while the focus of inventory space is on “optimization”. Emphasis should be placed on “people” as the core to promote the transformation of urban development patterns and land use patterns, and achieve the “five optimization” goals of inventory space resources, including structural optimization, efficiency optimization, benefit optimization, layout optimization, and quality optimization. In addition, we should systematically construct a full process technical system from survey evaluation, delimitation of key units, optimized utilization, and supporting systems. In the survey evaluation and unit delineation process, the focus is on building a stock space survey and evaluation model based on multiple data and indicator systems, focusing on the three major processes of evaluation standard construction, utilization survey, pattern recognition and verification. Then the final determined pattern should be incorporated into the basic information platform for land space planning and the “one map” system. On this basis, the scope of key units for stock space improvement is delineated. In the optimized utilization process, the key is to follow the basic principles of continuous context, people-oriented, green development, gradual progress, multiple participation, and joint construction and sharing, and to construct targeted comprehensive improvement methods from the aspects of spatial planning, policy mechanisms, and organizational models based on the different characteristics of the “three idle” and “four low” inventory space, with implementation orientation. In the supporting system, the “stock” thinking should be embedded in the entire process of land space planning and governance, focusing on strengthening the design of policies and systems related to stock space in the five major links of investigation and monitoring, planning preparation, development and utilization, ecological restoration, and supervision and inspection. Finally, combined with a typical urban case of Neijiang City, the aforementioned technical methods are verified through examples from aspects such as inventory space evaluation process, inventory space reuse, safeguard measures, and policy mechanisms.
Key words:  Urban Stock Space Planning and Governance  Technical System  Investigation and Evaluation  Optimized Utilization  System Construction