| 摘要: |
| 伴随国家经济社会全面进入高质
量发展阶段，城中村更新成为我国城市转
型升级发展的突破口与重要的空间支撑，
也成为相关话题研究的热点，但基于空间
规划学科的相关研究缺乏系统的梳理与总
结，造成学科对此研究的主体性不足、主
题性不明。为此，本研究基于城市规划类
期刊，以历史主义为切入点，应用文献研
究法，回顾我国空间规划学科研究城中村
更新的成就与不足。研究发现，我国城中
村更新改造研究可分为“城—村”割裂的
起步期（1998—2002年）、“城—村”共生
的兴盛期（2003—2007年）、“城—村”一
体的稳定期（2008—2012年）和“城—村”
共融的转型期（2013—2020年）四个阶段，相关研究秉承可持续发展理念，从更新改造的空间环境特征、产业经济特征、社会文化发
展特征以及改造更新模式四个方面开展，并呈现出五个转变轨迹与四大不足，文中最后剖
析了相关原因及提出研究展望。 |
| 关键词: 城中村 可持续发展 城市更新 城市规划类期刊 文献分析 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20220112 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目（51978476） |
|
| Review and Prospect of Urban Village Renewal Research in China: Literature AnalysisBased on Major Journals of Urban Planning |
|
WAN Chengwei,LONG Xiaoru
|
| Abstract: |
| With Chinese economy and society fully entering into the stage of high-quality
development, the renewal of villages in cities has become the breakthrough point and important
space support for urban transformation and upgrading in China. The renewal of urban villages
has become a hot topic in the research of spatial planning discipline and related disciplines.
However, the related research based on spatial planning discipline lacks systematic combing
and summarization, which leads to the lack of subjectivity and unclear theme of this research in
spatial planning discipline.
As well-known, spatial planning plays a strategic and leading role in the renewal of villages
in cities. Summarizing the research on the renewal of villages in cities by the discipline of spatial
planning will better understand the related trends of the development of villages in cities. So,
what topics do the spatial planning discipline mainly care about in the research of urban village
renewal, what trends exist in the existing research, what are the shortcomings and why? In order
to answer related questions, this study is based on the core journals of Chinese spatial planning,
taking historicism as the starting point, and applying the literature research method, reviewing the
achievements and shortcomings of urban village renewal in China’s spatial planning discipline.
It is found that the renewal of villages in cities in China stems from the needs of urban
infrastructure construction and urban function improvement in the Pearl River Delta region
during the rapid urbanization in 1990s. The renewal of villages in cities is characterized by
the demolition and reconstruction of inner cities, while the academic research on the renewal
of villages in cities began in 1998 and has been more than 20 years. The research has gone
through four stages. Firstly, the initial stage of urban-rural separation (1998-2002): exploring
the causes and main features of the formation of urban villages from the perspective of urban-
rural separation. Secondly, the flourishing period of urban-rural symbiosis (2003-2007): facing
up to the development value of urban villages. Thirdly, the stable period of the integration of
city and village (2008-2012): to explore the interdependent and symbiotic relationship between city and village. Fourthly, the transition period of co-prosperity between city and village (2013-2020): “city-village” integration under the background
of national transformation and upgrading. Based on the concept of sustainable development, the related research is carried out from four aspects: the
spatial environment characteristics, the industrial economic characteristics, the social and cultural development characteristics and the transformation
and renewal model. At each stage, due to the differences in the background of the times, the problems faced and the renewal objectives, the material
environment, industrial economy, social and cultural cognition of the villages in the city are far from the problems to be solved, and the adopted
renewal model is also quite different.
On the whole, there are five changing trends and four shortcomings in the research. Firstly, from the perspective of research, from the negative
attitude of urban-rural isolation to the positive attitude of urban-rural integration. Secondly, the research paradigm is gradually deepening from
phenomenon explanation to theoretical construction. Thirdly, the research method changes from qualitative empirical explanation to qualitative and
quantitative compound rational analysis. Fourthly, the research content changes from the traditional spatial optimization of physical environment to the
comprehensive system objectives such as policy mechanism setting. Fifthly, the research area expands from coastal developed cities such as the Pearl
River Delta to inland small and medium-sized cities. At the same time, there are four shortcomings in the research. Firstly, the emphasis on results
and policy recommendations, the lack of update process and effect evaluation. Secondly, the emphasis on results-oriented research, lack of continuous
tracking dynamic research. Thirdly, many phenomena are explained, lacking theoretical construction. Fourthly, individual micro-technology is
emphasized, while overall macro-policy research is ignored. The reasons for the above shortcomings are as follows: the research lacks interdisciplinary
integration, the limitation of one-dimensional discipline foundation, and the inducement of economic and social development stage.
To sum up, on the one hand, the village in the city is the main component of the unbalanced development of urban space, and it is also the most
challenging part to realize the high-quality development of cities in China. On the other hand, we should also see the diverse vitality and resilience
of the village in the city, and its unique role in the process of urbanization and the flow of urban and rural factors. Only by adhering to the sustainable
urban renewal which the material environment, industrial economy and social culture work together, can we change the passive “transfusion”
transformation that has been relying on top-down for a long time, realize the bottom-up active “hematopoietic” creation, and realize up-down
integration and coordinated renewal. |
| Key words: Urban Village Sustainable Development Urban Renewal Urban Planning Journals Literature Analysis |
