| 摘要: |
| 空间生产不仅是物质空间的再生产，
也是社会关系的再生产。以广州市猎德村为
例，对全面改造村落后村民与租户两类社会
群体的空间活动与社会交往情况进行深入
调查分析，引入空间测度量化分析方法，探
究空间与社会关系的耦合关联。研究发现：
城中村改造后形成了“传统遗存/再造空间”
与“重组现代空间”两种空间类型。前者属
于非符号化空间，有助于延续原住村民的社
会记忆与社会联系，具有排他性；村民依然
有较强的心理归属感和文化认同感，社会较
融合且个体间的社会联系较强，属于强势群
体。后者是社区主要的公共空间，具有非排
他性，但这类空间并无任何情感寄托，空间使用者很难在其中找到心理归属与文化认同，也难以实现社会关系的凝聚，新搬迁进入的社会
群体出现“社会原子化”特性。两种空间类型导致社区出现空间异质性特征。 |
| 关键词: 空间生产 城中村 空间与社会关系 猎德村 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20200414 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:亚热带建筑科学国家重点实验室开放课
题（2017ZB11）；广东省哲学社会科学规划
项目（GD19LN11）；广东省教育厅科研项
目（2018KTSCX070） |
|
| The Coupling Research on Space and Social Relations of Urban Village from Perspectiveof Space Production: A Case Study of Liede Village, Guangzhou |
|
SUN Ying,HE Ting
|
| Abstract: |
| Urban Village is a special product and a common phenomenon of rapid urban
space expansion in China. The “village” is surrounded by “city”, and the original production
structure, production relationship, living form, social structure, ritual custom and other spacial
and social forms in the village have changed greatly. In this process, the social relationship
after reproduction has become a new spatial description way of the urban village. Based on the
spatial production theory, this paper establishes the interactive coupling analysis of “spatial-
social relationship” of urban village and forms the micro-scale research of regional spatial
production.
Taking Liede Village of Guangzhou as an example, 190 residents in Liede Residential
District were selected through questionnaire surveys, semi-structured interviews and
participatory observations to conduct in-depth investigation and analysis of spatial activities
and social interactions between two types of social groups, namely villagers and tenants. Also,
the spatial measurement and quantitative analysis methods, such as the present index, were
introduced to explore the coupling relationship between spatial and social relations.
The result shows that: the social environment of the “home” of the villagers in Liede
community has not changed much, and the villagers’ senses of psychological belonging are
strong. However, most of the tenants just “live” here with short time of renting, but without
emotional basis, so they do not form the significant senses of psychological belonging. The
reconstruction of Liede Village keeps and reappears the typical traditional elements, continues
the rituals, customs and village culture. It virtually maintains the internal social connection of
the villagers. While the tenants have a clear sense of isolation in the traditional ritual activities
of Liede, less daily social interactions, and low cultural identity of the community. In the daily
community public space, the number of villagers is significantly more than that of tenants, and
the activity time is also significantly different. In the use of public service facilities, the present
index of education facilities is the highest, while the use rate of daily life service facilities is generally high and the present index is low. According to the measurement of the present index, the overlapping degree of spatial activities among
villagers is relatively higher, that is, the probability of co-occurrence in the same space is higher, and the potential social connection degree is
stronger. While the social communication and spatial activities of tenants in the community are relatively less, the opportunities of meeting each
other and villagers are less, and the potential social connection degree is weaker.
After the transformation of the urban villages, two spatial types of traditional remains/reconstruction space and reorganization of modern
space were formed. The former belongs to the non-symbolic space, which helps extend the social memory and social connection of the original
villagers. The villagers still have a strong sense of psychological belonging and cultural identity. The society is more integrated and the social
connections between individuals are stronger. The latter is the main public space of the community and is non-exclusive. However, there is
no emotional sustenance in such space. It is difficult for space users to find psychological affiliation and cultural identity, and it is difficult to
achieve social cohesion and new relocation society. The group has the characteristics of social atomization. Two spatial types lead to spatial
heterogeneity in the community. |
| Key words: Production of Space Urban Villages Space and Social Relationship Liede Village |
