| 摘要: |
| 本文以丹麦哥本哈根步行区和重
庆大坪片区作为研究样本，前者的步行网络
建设被公认为是成功的，后者则代表了目前
中国城市的普遍状况，二者的比对能直接
展现出步行网络建设水平的差异。目前针对
步行网络的量化分析方法要么是直接测算
而不能反应迭代效果，要么偏重于拓扑关
系而忽视了步行对非拓扑因素的敏感，本文
提出了效率—选择模型，以步行所敏感的实
际距离和交叉口流向为核心进行不同半径的
迭代计算。研究结果显示，与哥本哈根步行
区相比，重庆大坪片区的步行网络体系还有
着较大差距；同时也可以看出，本文所用模
型以及分析手段对于步行网络的量化研究
和科学指导城市设计都是有益的。 |
| 关键词: 步行网络 网络形态 重庆大坪 丹麦哥本哈根步行区 城市设计 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20150508 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家发改委应对气候变化项目CDM基金资
助（2012026）；国家自然科学基金资助项目
（51278503 ） |
|
| Comparative Analysis of the Pedestrian Network Configuration |
|
WEI Haoyan,LI Lu
|
| Abstract: |
| In regard to the object of study, the comparison between a successful case
in Europe and a case in China could remarkably ref lect the difference of the level of
pedestrian network construction. While in regard to the research method, the existing
calculation techniques of pedestrian network neglect the iterative effect in the calculation
process, or only focus on the topological relations rather than the sensitivity to the nontopological
factors of the pedestrian behavior. This study takes the pedestrian zone in
Copenhagen, Denmark, and the Daping district in Chongqing as the samples of study. By
building up a Choice-Efficiency model, this study acquires data of the samples through
field survey and open-source online maps. Applying ArcGIS as the analytical tool, the
two samples are analyzed comparatively, mainly in the range of 400m and 800m walking
distances. In the final analysis results, the pedestrian network system of Daping district in
Chongqing is far less developed, compared to that in Copenhagen, in terms of the Choice-
Efficiency model. In addition, the model and analytical method employed in this study are
both of great utility for the quantitative research on pedestrian network, and the rational
reference for urban design. |
| Key words: Pedestrian Network Network Configuration Chongqing Daping Pedestrian Zone
in Copenhagen Urban Design |
