Territorial space use control is a key link in the implementation of territorial space planning and the core system of territorial space development and protection. In the territorial space planning system, the compliance review of construction project land use is the top priority in the reform of the territorial space use control system, which is directly related to the rational use of territorial space and the smooth implementation of construction projects. Looking back, due to the differences in the objects and mechanisms of control between urban and rural planning and land use planning, although there is connection and complementarity in the review of construction land, the problem of overlapping is also relatively prominent, which has brought many obstacles to the implementation of construction projects. For example, some construction projects that comply with the urban and rural planning are difficult to advance due to the restrictions of the land use planning, or vice versa, resulting in cumbersome project approval procedures, prolonged time, and even some projects being forced to be shelved. The overall land use planning is based on the annual plan indicators, and takes the “land type + construction land control zone” in the lowest-level planning as the basis for the review of construction project land use. Through the management of major use categories and the flexible control of layout, as well as the differentiated planning review and modification mechanism established according to the type of construction project, the effective allocation of land resources is realized. Urban and rural planning adopts the hierarchical control mode of “master plan + detailed plan (village plan)”, focusing on the public welfare and implementing the differential land type control for cities, towns and villages to meet the development needs of different regions. Under the framework of territorial space planning, the “zoning-classification” territorial space use transmission mechanism has been established, and the land use control elements cover control lines, planning zones, land use classification and other aspects. In this context, this study proposes that the compliance review of construction projects under the territorial space planning system should implement the strategy of hierarchical, zonal and classified control. In terms of hierarchical control, the master plan and the detailed plan have different focuses on the content of land use control. At the master plan level, the compliance review is carried out in the way of “ ‘three lines’+planned land use+ planned zone” of the lowest-level territorial space master plan, and it is taken as an important basis for the review of land use approval, which helps to control the utilization direction and layout ofterritorial space from a macro perspective. At the detailed plan level, for the area within the urban development boundary, the focus is on the review of other planned land types except the public welfare land, and the land type and use compatibility of the regulatory detailed plan shall be strictly implemented to ensure the orderly progress of urban construction; outside the urban development boundary, the focus is on the review of the compliance of the construction land use in the village planning to ensure that the rural construction meets the actual needs of rural development. Zonal control reflects the differences in the access conditions and control methods of projects inside and outside the urban development boundary. When the use of the construction project meets the requirements of the compatibility of the planned land type, it can be regarded as complying with the master plan; outside the urban development boundary, the master plan carries out the use control according to the “access catalogue + planning zone”, which not only considers the functional orientation and development needs of different regions, but also can effectively guide the reasonable layout of the construction project. Classified control implements targeted control measures for different land types and different types of construction projects with different intensities, and establishes a flexible planned land type adjustment mechanism. For the situation involving the adjustment of the land type in the master plan, it can be classified and adjusted according to three different situations: technical correction, general adjustment and major adjustment, making the control more flexible and accurate. This study inherits and integrates the characteristics of the two-level control of urban and rural planning and the zonal control of the overall land use planning, fully reflects the characteristics of “integrating different plans into a single master plan”, makes the territorial space planning more coordinated and unified. At the same time, this control strategy also better adapts to the trend of combining rigidity and flexibility and hierarchical control of territorial space planning and the needs of planning implementation and management, provides operable ideas and suggestions for the improvement of China’s territorial space use control system, and helps to further improve the scientificity, rationality and effectiveness of territorial space use control and promote the high-quality development and protection of territorial space.