Comparisons on the Concept of Cultural Routes —The Different Ideas Among UNESCO World Heritage Committee, ICOMOS and European Institute of Cultural Routes
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • Article
  • |
  • Figures
  • |
  • Metrics
  • |
  • Reference
  • |
  • Related
  • |
  • Cited by
  • |
  • Materials
    Abstract:

    ICOMOS released The ICOMOS Charter on Cultural Routes in 2008, and the European Institute of Cultural Routes released the Rules for the Award of the “Cultural Route of the Council of Europe” Certification Revised in 2013, and UNESCO World Heritage Committee released the latest Operational Guidelines in 2013. As the three main institutions in research of Cultural routes, they have their own concept of Cultural Routes, which is different from each other in the way of naming and describing the “Cultural Route”. With comparisons towards their main documents, it can be found that ICOMOS and UNESCO World Heritage Centre emphasize the “heritage attribute” of Cultural Routes, however, the European Institute of Cultural Routes gives more sight on the “society attribute”, which reflects their experience along 30 years’ practices in research and conservation of Cultural Routes. Bounding the three concepts together and enhancing the understanding of Cultural Routes are important to the protection and conservation in China.

    Reference
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

郭 璇,杨浩祥.文化线路的概念比较* ——UNESCO WHC、ICOMOS、EICR相关理念的不同[J].西部人居环境学刊,2015,(2):44-48

Copy
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
History
  • Received:
  • Revised:
  • Adopted:
  • Online: May 12,2015
  • Published:
Copyright © 2025 Journal of Human Settlements in West China Press Ltd All rights reserved
Supported by:Beijing E-Tiller Technology Development Co., Ltd.