|
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 38次 下载 10次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
| 文化经济背景下商住混合型社区空间重构研究
——以贵阳花溪片区为例 |
|
白洁1,2, 侯玥3
|
|
1.（通讯作者）：北京工业大学建筑与城市规划学院，博士研究生;2.内蒙古工业大学建筑学院，副教授，512397425@qq.com;3.内蒙古工业大学建筑学院，硕士研究生
|
|
| 摘要: |
| 近年以文化资源为消费目标
的空间克隆生产逐渐成为我国商住混
合型社区营销发展的主要手段，这导
致这类型片区空间结构的演化呈现出
越来越强的经济利益驱动和多方利益
冲突特征。本文从文化经济背景切入，
以贵阳市花溪片区为研究对象，通过
深入剖析该片区文化经济发展过程中
利益驱动与多方利益冲突的内因，以
及对片区内部空间的梳理与分析，发
现该片区本土文化边缘化、文化空间
形式化以及精神文化脱域化三个问题，
将边缘化空间要素、形式化空间要素
与脱域化空间要素进行提取，并形成
问题空间系统，以此构建社区空间重
构体系，从优化空间功能，打通文化
壁垒；创新空间载体，空间形式多样
化；挖潜文化资源，强化经济活动三
个方面提出空间重构策略。本文旨在
从理论和实践中优化商住混合型社区
文化经济转型发展的新路径，进而为
同类型社区文化经济发展提供新思路。 |
| 关键词: 文化经济 商住混合型社区 空间重构 花溪片区 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240528002 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:内蒙古自然科学基金（2024LHMS05028）；2024 年自治区教育科学规划课题（NGJGH2024416） |
|
| Spatial reconstruction of mixed commercial and residential communities in the context ofcultural economy: Taking Huaxi area in Guiyang as an example |
|
BAI Jie,HOU Yue
|
| Abstract: |
| In recent years, driven by consumption upgrading and the rapid development of the cultural
industry, cultural resources have become a major target of urban residents’ lives and consumption. A spatialcloning
production model centered on cultural resources has gradually permeated the marketing and
planning of mixed-use residential-commercial communities in China, forming spatial evolution
characteristics that are primarily driven by economic interests, involve multiple stakeholders, and exhibit
pronounced conflicts. This paper, set against this macro background, takes the Huaxi area of Guiyang City
as a typical case, systematically reviews and deeply analyzes the interest-driving mechanisms and the
underlying sources of multi-party conflicts in the cultural-economic development of the area, and then
proposes targeted spatial reconstruction strategies to provide theoretical and practical references for culturaleconomic
transformation in similar communities. In the process of urbanization, mixed-use residentialcommercial
communities, which combine housing, commerce, and public services, have become an
important component of urban spatial structure. The rise of cultural consumption in recent years has
prompted developers and governmental departments to package cultural resources as “soft power”,
employing thematic streets, cultural-creative parks, art exhibitions, and other forms of spatial cloning
production to enhance community brand value and economic returns. However, this culture-oriented spatial
replication often neglects the deeper needs of local culture, leading to superficial, formalized cultural
resources and consequently causing functional mismatches and interest conflicts within the community.
Huaxi, a key new-town district in Guiyang, faces prominent issues such as the marginalization and
formalization of cultural space and the dislocation of spiritual culture, while simultaneously advancing rapid
commercial and residential development. A systematic study of this area not only helps reveal common
challenges in cultural-economic transformation of mixed-use communities but also offers actionable
improvement pathways for policymakers and planning practitioners. This study adopts a multi-method
approach that integrates literature review, case field investigation, in-depth interviews, and spatial analysis.
Firstly, by reviewing domestic and international theoretical achievements on cultural economics, spatial
cloning production, and mixed-use communities, an analytical framework is constructed. Secondly, field
visits are conducted in Huaxi to collect interview data from residents, commercial operators, cultural
institutions, and governmental agencies, thereby obtaining first-hand information on interest demands and
conflict points. Thirdly, the spatial layout of cultural facilities, the distribution of commercial formats, and
the usage of public spaces in the district are visualized to produce a systematic description of the spatial
structure. Based on the analysis, three core issues are distilled: 1)marginalization of local culture, 2)formalization
of cultural space, and 3)dislocation of spiritual culture, which together constitute a “problem-space system” that
underpins subsequent spatial reconstruction. Marginalization of Local Culture，during the planning phase, Huaxi
overly relied on external cultural symbols and commercial themes, resulting in insufficient integration and
display of local history, folk customs, and intangible heritage. Consequently, residents’ cultural identity with
the community has declined. Formalization of Cultural Space，a large number of cultural facilities are
oriented toward “display” and “consumption”, lacking functional and participatory attributes. These“showpiece” cultural spaces become detached from daily community life, leading to low utilization rates. Dislocation of Spiritual Culture，commercially driven
cultural activities are often centered on consumption scenarios, neglecting the spiritual dimension of cultural demand. Residents therefore find it difficult to
obtain deep cultural experiences and spiritual fulfillment in everyday life. To address the identified problems, the paper proposes a reconstruction system
centered on “optimizing spatial functions, innovating spatial carriers, and excavating cultural resources”. Key strategies include: functional Integration,
combine cultural facilities with public services, education, training, and leisure functions to increase space usage frequency. Community co-creation platforms,
encourage resident participation in cultural project planning and implementation, achieving decentralization of cultural production. Adoption of “micro-space”
and “elastic space” concepts, develop movable and transformable cultural venues such as mobile exhibition vehicles and modular art installations. Creation of
“Cultural Micro-Alleys”, within commercial streets and residential blocks, introduce small-scale art installations and handicraft workshops to form point-based
cultural networks. Systematic cataloguing of local intangible heritage, develop region-specific cultural-creative products to build a cultural industry chain.
Establishment of cultural-creative incubation bases, attract local creative teams and young artists, forming industry-academia-research collaborative innovation
platforms. Policy Incentives and Financial Support, guide capital toward cultural-creative enterprises, facilitating the value conversion of cultural resources.
Through the case study of Guiyang’s Huaxi area, this research reveals that culture-oriented spatial cloning production in mixed-use communities leads to local
cultural marginalization, spatial formalization, and spiritual cultural dislocation. Building on these insights, a systematic spatial reconstruction framework is
constructed, demonstrating that only through functional integration, carrier innovation, and deep resource excavation can high-quality cultural space
development be achieved, thereby promoting sustainable community economic growth. The study not only provides actionable recommendations for the actual
transformation of Huaxi but also offers a replicable strategy and practical experience for cultural-economic transformation in similar communities nationwide.
Future work may compare this framework with cases from other cities, exploring spatial reconstruction pathways under different regional contexts and
development stages, thereby contributing a more systematic academic and practical support to the overall enhancement of China’s urban cultural economy. |
| Key words: cultural economy mixed commercial and residential community spatial reconstruction Huaxi Area |
|
|
|
|
