| 摘要: |
| 超大特大城市积极稳步实施
城中村改造是改善民生、扩大内需、
推动城市高质量发展的一项重要举措。
基于超大城市武汉市4 个城中村安置区
的田野调查，本研究发现武汉市城中
村更新利益共享面临多重治理矛盾的
困境：更新模式中效率与公平的价值
目标矛盾、补偿中生存保障与发展权
益的价值兑现矛盾、共享主体界定中
产权原则与贡献原则的包容性矛盾和
治理实践中的主体博弈性矛盾。研究
建议未来应尝试实施政府与市场合作、
多主体利益共享的更新模式，剩余发
展权补偿与容积率管制并行，试行财
产税和增值税，设置奖惩制度加强城
中村更新实施过程监管等优化路径，
以完善城中村更新利益共享机制，提
高城乡空间治理水平。 |
| 关键词: 城中村更新 利益共享 治
理性矛盾 优化路径 超大特大城市 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240523002 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目（72374080）；海南省自然科学基金（725MS064）；2023 年度海南省哲学社会科学规划课题青年项目（HNSK(QN)23-91）；湖南
省社会科学成果评审委员会一般课题（XSP24YBC539） |
|
| Research on the dilemma and implementation path of benefit sharing in the renewal ofurban villages in mega cities: Taking Wuhan as an example |
|
YANG Qing,XIE Jin,WANG Mei
|
| Abstract: |
| In the context of high-quality urban development, the construction of a spatial governance system
that supports such development continues to face numerous challenges. For instance, spatial governance
projects such as urban village renewal and old city renovation may exacerbate social divisions and conflicts
due to disputes over interest distribution. The steady and proactive implementation of urban village renewal
in mega-cities is a critical measure for improving livelihoods, expanding domestic demand, and promoting
high-quality urban development. However, urban village renewal has become a focal and challenging issue
in the equitable allocation of development rights in urban and rural spatial governance due to its complex
property rights. In Wuhan, over 80% of urban villages have either been transformed or are in the process of
being transformed into urban communities, accumulating substantial experience in renewal practices.
Wuhan’s urban village renewal practices can be categorized into two models based on the leading actors:
self-driven renewal and government-led joint renewal. Housing compensation policies primarily fall into
two categories: area-based and population-based, with area-based policies further divided into constrained
and unconstrained compensation. Accordingly, this study selects four resettlement communities in Wuhan—
Xiyuan Community, Guanggu Youth City Community, Shili Community, and Liyuzhou Community—as
research areas for field investigations, based on their renewal models and compensation policies. Using an
analytical framework of “practical dilemmas—optimization pathways,” the study identifies and summarizes
the contradictions in the design of spatial governance rules and practical contradictions in subject interaction
in the interest-sharing mechanisms of urban village renewal in Wuhan. The findings aim to provide insights
for optimizing interest-sharing mechanisms in urban village renewal and other types of spatial governance in
Wuhan and other mega-cities.Research has found that the practical dilemma of benefit sharing in the renewal
of urban villages in Wuhan city stems from multiple governance contradictions the contradiction between
the value goals of efficiency and fairness in the renewal model, the contradiction between the value
realization of survival guarantee and development rights in compensation policies, the inclusiveness
contradiction between the property rights principle and contribution principle in the definition of sharing
subjects, and the subject game contradiction in governance practice. Building on the interplay between
stakeholders, policy objectives, and implementation processes, the study proposes optimized pathways for
interest-sharing in urban village renewal in Wuhan and other mega-cities. To address the challenge of
balancing fairness and efficiency in renewal models, the study suggests a collaborative government-market
development model with multi-stakeholder interest-sharing. To tackle the lack of empowerment for migrant
populations, it recommends establishing more inclusive interest-sharing mechanisms, particularly
emphasizing equal rights for migrants. To improve the efficiency and equity of compensation policies, the
study proposes “compensating residual development rights and strengthening floor area ratio (FAR)
regulation.” To address the social equity shortcomings in housing compensation policies and the capture of
additional benefits by rural elites, the study advocates for the use of tax instruments to optimize interest-sharing mechanisms. Finally, the study recommends enhancing process supervision and implementing reward-punishment mechanisms. |
| Key words: urban village renewal interest-sharing governance-related contradictions optimization path megacities |
