引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 289次   下载 371 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
媒介地理视角下的乡村空间重构:理论框架与实证案例
范建红1, 叶葳2, 薛林涛2, 谢涤湘3
1.广东工业大学建筑与城市规划学院,教授;2.广东工业大学建筑与城市规划学院,硕士研究生;3.(通讯作者):广东工业大学建筑与城市规划学院,教授,xiedixiang@gdut.edu.cn
摘要:
基于媒介地理学的“四象限”理论 和列斐伏尔的“空间三元论”,系统分析数 字媒介对乡村空间的物质性、文化性与社会 性的重构,揭示数字中介化重塑乡村经济实 践形态、文化认同逻辑与空间权力配置的过 程,提出“媒介—人—空间”的理论分析框 架。研究发现,媒介渗透既推动乡村空间的 “去地域化”,也催生新的乡村地方依恋,在 物质空间层面,通过促进信息传播引发乡村 物质空间的变化;在文化空间层面,对乡村 符号景观的重构并推动人对乡村情感体验的 改变;在社会空间层面,通过影响社会关系 的生产与再生产并重塑乡村社会权力空间。 研究有望为媒介地理更好地服务乡村振兴提 供参考。
关键词:  媒介地理  乡村空间  社交媒介  空间重构
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20240904004
分类号:
基金项目:教育部人文社科规划项目(23YJAZH028);广东省自然科学基金(2024A1515011291);国家自然科学基金 (42571265)
Reconstruction of rural space from the perspective of media geography: Theoreticalframework and empirical cases
FAN Jianhong,YE Wei,XUE Lintao,XIE Dixiang
Abstract:
Grounded in the Four-Quadrant Theory of media geography and Lefebvre’s Trialectics of Spatiality, this study systematically investigates how social media reconstructs the materiality, culturality, and sociality of rural space. It reveals the process through which media intermediation reshapes the forms of rural economic practices, the logic of cultural identity, and the configuration of spatial power. Based on these theoretical foundations, the paper proposes an analytical framework of “media-human-space”, aiming to interpret how the penetration of digital media reshapes the spatial structures and symbolic meanings of the contemporary Chinese countryside. The research demonstrates that media penetration simultaneously drives the de-territorialization of rural spac by loosening geographical constraints and reconfiguring flows of capital, information, as well as labor, and generates new forms of local attachment through mediated emotional connections and the reconstruction of place identity.At the material-spatial level, social media reshapes the organization of economic activities and the circulation of rural commodities through technological mediation. Livestreaming, short-video marketing, and other digital practices embed the traditional functions of rural marketplaces into mobile interfaces, transforming the smartphone into a portable marketplace that digitally reorganizes the people-goods-place relationship. The resulting online ordering-directfrom- source model dissolves the traditional center-periphery hierarchy, connecting remote villages directly to national and even global consumer networks. In this process, farmers are transformed from conventional producers into integrated media performers, combining production, marketing, and storytelling in a single practice. The spatial implications of this transformation indicate that rural material space is no longer merely a site of agricultural production but also a field of media performance, tourism development, and symbolic value creation. Such symbolic reproduction of material space exemplifies Lefebvre’s notion of spatial practice and illustrates the dual process of deterritorialization and re-territorialization under media mediation. At the cultural-spatial level, social media functions as a key mechanism in producing, circulating, and consuming rural imagery. The study identifies three major expressive paradigms within rural media texts: aestheticized expression, authentic expression, and stigmatized expression. Aestheticized expression constructs idealized pastoral utopias through visual and linguistic rhetoric—filters, color tones, and poetic captions, that transform everyday rural life into a consumable aesthetic spectacle. Authentic expression, in contrast, presents unembellished depictions of daily labor and local customs, emphasizing sincerity and proximity. Through vernacular language and on-site narration, it restores a sense of lived experience that resists urban romanticization. Stigmatized expression centers on the representation of rural decay, poverty, and marginality, employing sentimental or sensational tropes that reinforce social stereotypes and intensify urban-rural divisions. These representational modes coexist and interact, together constituting a complex symbolic landscape where the rural is simultaneously idealized, normalized, and problematized.The cultural reconstruction of rural space manifests a three-dimensional interplay among symbol, space, and power. Social media accelerates the symbolic mobility of rural signs,allowing local cultural symbols to travel across regions and social classes, while also reshaping the geography of recognition and identity. The rise of grassroots discourse, such as that expressed by returnee youth through agricultural livestreaming, represents a bottom-up struggle for representational power and spatial agency. In this sense, social media transforms the countryside from a passively viewed object into an active subject of spatial production and cultural narration. The symbolic geography of the rural is therefore a dynamic site of negotiation where authenticity, aesthetics, and stigma converge under the logic of digital platforms and algorithmic visibility. At the social-spatial level, social media reconstructs rural social relations through the dual mechanisms of deterritorialization and re-embedding. It extends traditional kinship and neighborhood networks into virtual space, allowing for the coexistence of online and offline interactions within the same social fabric. Digital communication redefines interpersonal intimacy, turning online greetings and comments into substitutes for physical encounters. At the same time, media technologies alter generational hierarchies: younger villagers, equipped with digital literacy and technical skills, become new information nodes, while elders shift from authoritative communicators to passive recipients. This redistribution of communicative power signals the reorganization of social hierarchy and authority in the rural context. Yet, the same process also generates new inequalities. Algorithmic recommendation systems and capital-driven visibility regimes often privilege certain picturesque villages while marginalizing others, leading to uneven development and new forms of spatial injustice. Overall, the findings indicate that the pervasive infiltration of social media has produced a systematic reconstruction of rural space across material, cultural, and social dimensions. Media mediation does not only change the spatial morphology and symbolic representation of the countryside but also reshape the interactional logic between urban and rural systems. The essence of this reconstruction lies in the dialectical interplay between technological empowerment and media regulation, reflecting the broader social negotiation between modernization, locality, and digital capitalism. Through the proposed media-human-space analytical framework, this study elucidates the internal mechanisms and dynamic logic of media intermediation in rural spatial transformation. It contributes to the localization and theoretical expansion of media geography and provides empirical insight into the digital pathways of China’s rural revitalization.
Key words:  media geography  rural space  social media  space reconstruction