| 摘要: |
| 中国式现代化治理目标下，城市更
新应承担起高质量发展、实现城市治理体系
和治理能力现代化的重要使命。城市更新后
评估是城市更新全生命管理周期的重要环
节，自2021 年衔接城市体检工作以后，其
重要性更加突出。在总结我国城市更新后评
估研究的时空特征基础上，本文构建了“类
型—尺度”整体分析框架，对当前国内城市
更新后评估既有研究进行系统梳理。研究发
现，我国城市更新后评估经历了从经济效益
到综合效益的价值转变，研究整体呈现滞后
性、零碎性特征；不同类型城市更新后评估
在相同尺度下的关注重点存在共性，更新类
型与空间尺度是影响后评估指标体系差异的
主要因素。总体而言，当前城市更新后评估
指标构建缺乏对城市现代化治理的深刻理
解，评估方法有待改进。最后对现代化治理
背景下城市更新后评估研究进行了角色反思
与未来展望，以期进一步丰富我国城市更新
理论与方法。 |
| 关键词: 城市更新 后评估 现代化治理 类型—尺度 整体视角 |
| DOI：10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20241017001 |
| 分类号: |
| 基金项目:国家自然科学基金面上项目（51778078）；重庆市自然科学基金面上项目（cstc2021jcjy-msxmX1055） |
|
| Review of post-urban regeneration assessment research in China in the context ofmodernized governance: A holistic angle of view based on type-scale |
|
HUANG Ling,LIU Zukang,LUO Junhang
|
| Abstract: |
| Under the goals of Chinese path to modernization governance, urban regeneration should
undertake the important mission of high-quality development, realizing the modernization of system
and capacity for urban governance. The post-assessment is an important part of the lifecycle
management of urban regeneration, and its importance has become more prominent since it was
connected with urban physical examination in 2021.This paper uses statistical, bibliometric, and data
visualization methods to analyze the current research on post-urban regeneration assessment in China.
On the basis of summarizing the spatiotemporal characteristics of post-urban regeneration assessment
research in China, this paper constructs an overall analysis framework of “type-scale” and organizes
the existing research on post-urban regeneration assessment in China. The main research findings are
as follows: In terms of spatiotemporal characteristics: 1) The post-urban regeneration assessment in
China has undergone a value transformation from economic benefits to comprehensive benefits. 2)
Regions with high urbanization rates, such as Guangdong, Beijing, Shanghai, and Chongqing, exhibit
a higher concentration of published studies on post-urban regeneration assessment. Furthermore,
research in this domain within these regions demonstrates a rapid pace of development. 3) The
existing research on post-urban regeneration assessment are lagging and fragmented, significantly
influenced by relevant national and local policies and systems, urban regeneration practices, and
actions.Research on the evaluation index system of existing urban regeneration have found that:1) The
focus of post-urban regeneration assessment for different types of urban regeneration shares
commonalities at the same scale. The macro-scale mainly focuses on its overall connection and
interaction with the city, exploring the impact of various types of regeneration on the cultural,
economic, social, and environmental functions of the city. At the mid-scale, various types of update
objects are often viewed as a whole, and their post-assessment emphasizes more on the changes and
effects of the whole itself, with an emphasis on exploring community cohesion. At the micro-scale,
post-assessment is often conducted from aspects such as material space facilities and user satisfaction.
2) The type of regeneration and spatial scale are the main factors affecting the differences in postassessment
indicator systems. Overall, the selection of indicators is mostly derived from domestic
and international standards, established evaluation systems, keywords searches of relevant literature,
and expert questionnaires. This approach ensures the scientific rigor and comprehensive coverage of
the indicator selection process. Currently, the techniques for post-urban regeneration assessment in
China mostly focus on multi-attribute decision-making, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, expert
analysis, factor analysis, and other methods derived from sociology, economics, policy analysis, and
other fields. In general, the current construction of post-urban regeneration assessment indicators
lacks a deep understanding and emphasis on urban modern governance, and the assessment methods
are still relatively conventional. Finally, this paper conducted a role reflection and future outlook on
post-urban regeneration assessment research under the context of modern governance. we believe that |
| Key words: urban regeneration post-assessment modern governance type-scale holistic angle of view |
