引用本文:
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   查看/发表评论  【EndNote】   【RefMan】   【BibTex】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 466次   下载 708 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
村镇土地利用效益及耦合协调度评价研究 ——以天津市蓟州区为例
李亚丽1, 秦李虎2, 朱德铭3, 赵 亮4, 周政旭5
1.北京林业大学园林学院,博士研究生;2.清华大学建筑学院,博士研究生;3.北京林业大学园林学院,硕士研究生;4.清华大学建筑学院,副教授;5.( 通讯作者):清华大学建筑学院,副教 授,83306518@qq.com
摘要:
土地利用变化是影响村镇发展的重要 因素,长期以来,我国村镇用地存在布局散乱、 粗放利用、空心村等问题,如何实现村镇土地的 合理高效利用成为村镇空间优化的重要问题。 目前,村镇土地的相关研究集中在土地发展问 题解析、动态演变分析、规划管理机制等方面, 开展村镇土地利用效益定量分析的研究较少。 因此,本文以促进村镇土地可持续利用为导向, 从经济、社会和生态三个维度选取18个指标构 建了村镇土地利用效益评价指标体系,并以天 津市蓟州区为例,采用多源数据融合的方式获取 949个村庄层级相关数据,通过计算村镇土地利 用效益及耦合协调度加以实证。研究结果与实 地调研情况基本一致,蓟州区村庄的经济效益 偏低,社会效益处于中等水平,生态效益良好。 总体协调度南低北高,且两两间的耦合协调度存在明显差异,社会—生态效益的耦合协调度明显高于经济—社会效益和经济—生态效益的耦 合协调度,且整体处于较高水平。文章基于分析结果对蓟州区村镇土地利用提出优化建议,为促 进村镇可持续发展、有效实施乡村振兴战略和乡村建设行动提供参考。
关键词:  村镇土地利用  土地利用效益  耦合协调模型  天津市  蓟州区
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20220402
分类号:
基金项目:“十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD1100300)
Research on Evaluation of Land Use Efficiency and Coupling Coordination Degree inVillages and Towns: Taking Jizhou District of Tianjin as an Example
LI Yali,QIN Lihu,ZHU Deming,ZHAO Liang,ZHOU Zhengxu
Abstract:
Under the background of rapid urbanization, the issue of urban-rural integration development has always been a hot topic of research at domestic and abroad, and all countries have carried out exploration and practice in light of their own actual conditions. The proposal and implementation of our country’s rural revitalization strategy and rural construction actions have important guiding significance for the coordinated development of urban and rural areas and the development and construction of villages and towns. Land is an important spatial carrier of human social and economic activities and ecological resources, and land use change is an important factor affecting the development of villages and towns. For a long time, the economic- centered and city-biased development strategies have led to problems such as scattered layout and extensive use of land in villages and towns in our country, the per capita construction land in rural areas is larger than the per capita construction land in urban areas, and the phenomenon of hollow villages has also appeared widely. The spatial allocation pattern of village land and the level of resource output together constitute the efficiency of village land use. Therefore, the rationalization and efficiency of village land use have become an important issue in the optimization of village space. At present, the related researches on village and town land focus on the analysis of land development problems, dynamic evolution analysis, planning and management mechanism, etc., and there are few studies on quantitative analysis of village and town land use efficiency. Therefore, this paper takes the promotion of sustainable land use in villages and towns as the guide, selects 18 indicators from three dimensions of economy, society and ecology to construct the evaluation index system of village and town land use efficiency. 949 village-level related data were obtained in a fusion way, and empirical evidence was obtained by calculating the land use efficiency and coupling coordination degree of villages and towns. The research results are basically consistent with the field investigation. The economic efficiency of villages in Jizhou District is dominated by the area space with lower scores. The main reason is that most of the villages have a single industry, mainly traditional agricultural production. Inrecent years, the industrial transformation and upgrading and structural adjustment have resulted in relatively low income related to the secondary and tertiary industries. The social efficiency is mainly in the area with medium and upper middle scores, which reflects the important role of infrastructure construction as an important starting point for the implementation of our country’s rural revitalization strategy in improving the living environment of villages and enhancing the social efficiency of villages. The spatial distribution of ecological efficiency is obviously low in the south and high in the north. The main reason is that the northern villages are dominated by forest land, with a good natural resource base, and the vegetation coverage index and habitat quality index are relatively high, while the southern villages are dominated by cultivated land. At the same time, the density of resident population in villages is high, which leads to greater human interference factors and higher resident population carried by unit construction land. The overall coupling degree is similar to the distribution characteristics of economic efficiency in space, and the type is dominated by villages in the running- in period. The overall coordination degree is similar to the ecological efficiency in space, showing the distribution characteristics of low in the south and high in the north. There are obvious differences in the degree of coupling and coordination between two efficiencies. Among them, the coupling degree of economic efficiency and social efficiency is mainly in the antagonistic period and the running-in period. The coupling degree of economic efficiency and social efficiency obviously shows the characteristics of high in the south and low in the north. Most of the northern villages are in the antagonistic period, and the southern villages are mainly in the running-in period. The coupling degree of social efficiency and ecological efficiency is in a high- level coupling period as a whole. In general, the coupling coordination degree of social efficiency and ecological efficiency is obviously higher than that of economic efficiency-social efficiency and economic efficiency-ecological efficiency. Finally, based on the evaluation results, the article focuses on the protection of the natural resources system of villages and towns, and builds and optimizes the ecological security pattern; explores the multiple values of natural resource conditions or human resources characteristics of villages and towns, and provides a basis for the integrated development of industries; strengthens the long-term management and maintenance of infrastructure, to improve the level of productive infrastructure in villages and towns, and puts forward suggestions on optimizing land use in villages and towns in Jizhou District, providing reference for promoting sustainable development of villages and towns, effectively implementing rural revitalization strategies and rural construction actions.
Key words:  Village and Town Land Use  Land Use Efficiency  Coupling and Coordination Model  Tianjin  Jizhou District