摘要: |
市场经济下,利用商品住宅用地配
建政策性住房是城市中低收入人群“住有
所居”的重要保障。基于规划得益的视角,
分析政府政策、规划干预、市场资本在政策
性住房市场配建模式中的作用过程;基于商
品住房和政策性住房之间的物理隔离,探讨
资源差异化供给的内在资本逻辑和主体影响
机制,提出单一经济属性的“以房养房”配
建模式边缘化使用主体,是混合居住产生社
会矛盾的深层次原因。建议强化“人”的角色
参与,建立“住房—人才—产业”互动关联的
发展思路,通过引入“交通+”“就业+”“服
务+”等创新模式,扩大政策性住房的配建
渠道;完善地方政府“产业运营者”和市场主
体“物业运营者”角色,“以产养房”带动城
市中低收入居民全面发展。 |
关键词: 政策性住房 规划得益 市场配建 |
DOI:10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20200113 |
分类号: |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51878285);2019年度广
州市哲学社会科学发展“十三五”规划重大委托
课题(2019GZWTZD01) |
|
Research on the Market Allocation Model of Policy-based Housing from the Perspective of Planning Gain |
WANG Shifu,ZHANG Xiaoyang,DENG Zhaohua
|
Abstract: |
The first part of the paper is the research review and phenomenon description, it
introduces the research background and research questions, describes the development process,
allocation practice, and practical dilemma of policy-based housing. Under the market economy in
China, the allocation of residential land for policy-based housing is a crucial guarantee for middleand low-income residents to live in the city. A large number of policy-based housing allocations
began in 2007. Under the premise of the nationalization of land ownership, the government provides
tax incentives, financial support, land supply priority, land price restriction, and other policies to
guide market participants in policy-based housing allocation. Essentially, the policy-based housing
allocation is a way of using planning methods to achieve “planning gain”. The administrative
departments grant planning permission, and the market provides funds for construction to make
up for the negative externalities caused by the development of commercial housing to urban
transportation, municipal facilities, and other aspects, and to restore the public interests.
The second part of the paper is the characteristics identification and mechanism analysis,
clarifying the capital logic of the market allocation model of policy-based housing, and
analyzing the influence mechanism of the allocation subject. Although the policy-based housing
allocation realizes the housing mix of different social classes, avoids the problems of residential
differentiation and social isolation, it also can cause social contradictions due to the differentiated
supply of public services. The paper holds that the current market allocation model is a kind
of capital logic of “commercial housing for policy-based housing” with the task-based supply
thinking. From the role analysis, it regards the local government as the “operator” who supplies
the urban residential land, and also the “person liable” who supervises the policy-based housing.
The real estate developer pays the land transfer fee, is the “investor” who uses the residential
land, and is also the “implementer” who constructs the policy-based housing. Both policy-based
housing owners and commercial housing owners are passively accepting marginalized roles.
The third part of the paper is strategy response and research expansion. To coordinate
and arrange the long-term development of low and middle-income residents and sustainable
urban development, it puts forward the strategies of innovating the market allocation model
and appropriately extends the role of local government and market subject. It emphasizes
that the role participation of “residents” should be strengthened in the allocation process.
Aiming at the sustainable development of “growth coalition”, local governments should |
Key words: Policy-Based Housing Planning Gain Market Allocation |