| 摘要: |
| 老旧住区是我国城市老年人居住的主要场所，住房与老年人经历了共生长和共衰老的“双老化”过程，此类住区是老旧住区更新的重要类型。积极老龄化框架下的老年友好社区实践作为改善居家社区养老的方法越来越受到普遍关注，其旨在为老年人塑造出满足安居(吃住看病和基本锻炼），乐居（个人兴趣的满足和开发）和家居（邻里共建和贡献参与）三个层次目标的宜居社区，但目前在此框架下开展的针对“双老化”住区更新的研究和实践仍存在不足。为此，本研究选取北京四个典型的“双老化”住区，采用活动路径记录法归纳老年群体从事积极生活行为的规律特征，并结合以老年人为主的针对多方利益主体的非结构式访谈进一步分析环境空间，经济等维度的要素影响其行为积极度以及阻碍制约住区可持续更新进程的深层次原因。最后，从城市-社区-，社区-住区-，住区-建筑三个空间尺度提出“双老化”住区的环境改造策略和政策建议。 |
| 关键词: “双老化”住区 老年友好 活动行为 适老化改造 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:TU98 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Study on the influence of “double aging” neighborhoods on the active living behaviors of the elderly |
|
chenmingyu
|
| Abstract: |
| Older neighborhoods are the main places for the elderly to live in Chinese cities. Housing and the elderly have experienced the "double ageing" process of co-growth and co-ageing. Such residential areas are an important type of older neighborhoods regeneration. The practice of age friendly communities for the elderly under the framework of active aging has received more and more attention as a method to improve the care of the elderly in the home and community. This practice is to meet ease living (basic life needs), happy living (personal interest development) and home living (neighborhood co-construction and participation), but the research and practice on the “double ageing” neighborhoods regeneration under this framework are still insufficient. For this reason, this study selects four typical "double-ageing" neighborhoods in Beijing, using the activity path recording method to summarize the characteristics of the elderly group engaged in active life behavior, and combining the elderly-based interviews with multi-stakeholders to further analyze the factors of environmental space, economy and other dimensions that affect their behavioral positivity and the deep reasons that hinder the sustainable regeneration process of older neighborhoods. Finally, combining the research conclusions, it puts forward environmental regeneration strategies and policy recommendations for "double ageing" neighborhoods from the three spatial scales of cities and communities, communities and residential areas, residential areas and buildings. |
| Key words: “double aging” neighborhood age-friendly activity behaviors aging modification |
